Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - There is no prima facie satisfaction ...

Income Tax

November 23, 2023

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - There is no prima facie satisfaction which has been recorded by the AO for initiation of penalty proceedings which can be discerned from reading of the assessment order. - Addition has been made, merely, on a presumptive basis which is not sufficient for acquiring jurisdiction as contemplated by the provisions of section 271(1B) - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - There is no prima facie satisfaction ...

Income Tax

November 23, 2023

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessment order, by a fiction of law, is deemed to constitute satisfaction of the Assessing Officer for initiation of penalty proceedings - HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - manadation of recording satisfaction which limb of the provisions of Section 271(1)(c) of the Act was triggered - In a given case, both limbs may...

Stay of demand for penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - quantum appeal pending - assessee prima-facie having fair chance of win - enforcement for recovery would cause serious loss...

Validity of Initiation of proceedings u/s 153C - as argued satisfaction note of the searched person and satisfaction note of the petitioner (other than the searched...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - recording of satisfaction - penalty initiated u/s 143(3) order for concealment of particulars of income - penalty imposed for furnishing of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - recording of satisfaction - mere direction in the assessment order to initiate penalty proceedings - Concealment/furnishing inaccurate...

Penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) - satisfaction relates to Section 271AAA - satisfaction of the AO qua a wrong section for the purposes of penalty of strict nature is...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Tribunal proceeded on hyper- technicalities and acted as though every seizure must entail initiation of proceedings u/s 271 of the Act - no penalty - HC

Levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - since no specific satisfaction has been recorded by the Ld. Assessing Officer either in the body of the assessment order or in the show...

Quick Updates: