Amortisation u/s section 35D - Euro issue expenditure - the ...

Income Tax

April 12, 2013

Amortisation u/s section 35D - Euro issue expenditure - the expenditure that qualified for consideration under section 35D is restricted by reason of use of the phrase "being" - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Amortisation u/s section 35D - Euro issue expenditure - the ...

Income Tax

April 12, 2013

You may also like:

Addition u/s 35D – Expenses on repair of work place - expenses are for the purposes of repairs on rented premises cannot be said to be preliminary expenses, eligible for...

Expenditure incurred on issue of shares (public issue expneses) are not allowable expenditure u/s 35D ...... - HC

Addition towards ROC expenses - section 35D provides amortization of certain expenses, which are in the nature of capital/intangibles/preliminary expenses, which have...

Allowance of expenditure in respect of preliminary expenses under section 35D - an apparent extension or expansion must take place by establishing new undertaking - The...

Disallowance of amortization of premium on leasehold land - Looking to the nature of the advantage which the assessee obtained in a commercial sense, the expenditure...

Project development expenditure - there is no concept of deferred revenue expenditure in the Act, except under specific section, i.e. where amortisation is specifically...

The assessee, who has already got deduction under Section 37 to re-work and claim the benefit under Section 35AB on the basis of amortization of capital expenditure- SC

Assessee's entitlement for amortization u/s 35-D - expenses related to the 'Euro issue' - the word "expansion" in relation to industrial activity gives the meaning as...

Deduction u/s 35D - the assessee had increased the share capital by way of private placement with its holding, hence, deduction u/s 35D not allowable to the assessee - AT

Amortization of expenditure u/s 35D - under the very same provisions benefit is allowed for the first two Assessment Years and, therefore, it could not have been denied...

Quick Updates: