Maintainability of appeal before High Court - appropriate forum ...

Supreme Court Holds Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Valuation and Duty Assessment of Excisable Goods, Not High Court.

January 23, 2024

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Maintainability of appeal before High Court - appropriate forum - it clearly transpires that one of the issues involved relates to determination of valuation of excisable goods and/or rate of duty of excisable goods, amongst other things, for the purpose of assessment. - it falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Apex Court under Section 35L of the Act - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Maintainability of appeal before High Court - appropriate forum ...

Supreme Court Holds Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Valuation and Duty Assessment of Excisable Goods, Not High Court.

January 23, 2024

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

The Delhi High Court considered the validity of an arbitral award and the jurisdiction of the Facilitation Council u/s 18 of the MSME Act. The key issue was the...

The HC held that the Jurisdictional Assessment Officer (JAO) has exclusive jurisdiction to issue notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act. For assessment, re-assessment or...

Arbitration - The jurisdiction clause of an agreement, the absence of words like “alone”, “only”, “exclusive” or “exclusive jurisdiction” is neither decisive nor does it...

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - the object of both the provisions is clear and the only difference is that Chapter X uses the word “remission” of duty on excisable goods”...

Addition on valuation of closing stock - excise duty on closing stock of its finished goods - exclusive VS inclusive method - although the method of valuation of stock...

Validity of assessment - no notice u/s 143(2) - the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (DCIT) was bad in law for want of issuance of notice u/s 143(2) of...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Jurisdiction of Income Tax Authorities - Power to transfer cases - the assessment framed by ACIT, Circle-23(1), Hooghly, is bad in law...

This case involves a challenge to an order of re-assessment under the relevant tax laws. The key points are: The petitioner failed to submit monthly returns within the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - second re-assessment notice u/s 148A - The High Court noted that the petitioner did not challenge the earlier re-assessment order dated...

Validity of assessment - Jurisdiction - An irregularity in the assessment order may be rectified by remitting back the matter to the assessment. In the case on hand it...

Even if attracting nil rate of duty, the goods remain excisable and they do not become non-excisable. Therefore, just because the goods listed in the schedule attract...

Faceless assessment provisions u/s 151A require notice u/s 148 for income escaping assessment to be issued by Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO), not Jurisdictional...

The assessee purchased agricultural land whose stamp duty valuation was lower than the actual purchase consideration. The authorities sought to invoke section 56(2)(x)...

Excisable goods - even though the product in this case is marketable, it does not answer to the question of ‘excisable goods’ as, practically there can be no levy of...

Relevance of the valuation report received after assessment, the application of mind by the PCIT in invoking Section 263 revision jurisdiction, the treatment of...

Quick Updates: