Validity of reassessment order - Notice sent on wrong (old) ...

Reassessment Notice Invalid Due to Use of Outdated Email; Court Quashes Tax Proceedings Against Company.

February 29, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Validity of reassessment order - Notice sent on wrong (old) E-mail ID - The petitioner company had two email addresses, one used until 2019 and another operational since then. - The notice under Section 148A (b) was sent to the old email address, despite the petitioner's consistent use of the new email address since 2020. - The High Court held that the notice issued under Section 148A(b) to the incorrect email address was invalid, thereby rendering subsequent proceedings void. The court quashed the order passed by the Assessing Authority and the consequential notices for reassessment.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of reassessment order - Notice sent on wrong (old) ...

Reassessment Notice Invalid Due to Use of Outdated Email; Court Quashes Tax Proceedings Against Company.

February 29, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

The HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned reassessment notice and subsequent proceedings. The AO's satisfaction note for invoking reassessment proceedings...

The High Court quashed the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, holding it to be a case of "change of opinion" and...

Section 143(2) is a mandatory requirement, and failure to comply with it renders the reassessment proceedings invalid. The High Court has consistently held that Section...

The High Court held that the reassessment order dated 12.05.2023 and subsequent proceedings were invalid as they were beyond the statutory limitation period prescribed...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - AO framed assessment order on died company - in the absence of a valid notice, the AO has no authority to assume the jurisdiction to assess the...

HC upheld tax reassessment proceedings for AY 2009-2010, finding valid jurisdictional grounds for reopening assessment. The court determined that information about bogus...

The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

Validity of reopening an assessment and the legality of issuing a new Show Cause Notice u/s 148-A(b) after the conclusion of initial reassessment proceedings. The key...

Validity of reassessment proceedings for non-issuance of statutory notice u/s 143(2) - Since notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was not issued to the assessee, before...

HC quashed reassessment proceedings initiated against a dissolved company, finding them without jurisdiction and contrary to law. The proceedings violated statutory...

Notice issued against dissolved firm invalid; firm ceased to exist, rendering reassessment proceedings untenable. Apex Court's decision in Maruti Suzuki case mandates...

The ITAT held that the reassessment notice u/s 148 for AY 2014-15 and AY 2015-16 was time-barred. For AY 2014-15, the assessee failed to respond within the two-week...

HC invalidated reassessment proceedings against the petitioner under Section 148A, finding a critical procedural defect. The AO's notice failed to substantiate the claim...

Reassessment action initiated based on Section 148 notice and subsequent Section 148A(b) notice violated the First Proviso to Section 149(1) and was barred by the...

Quick Updates: