Disciplinary proceeding against the govt officer - Punishment of ...

Court Overturns Pension Withholding for Officer; No Evidence of Misconduct or Conduct Rules Breach Found.

March 9, 2024

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

Disciplinary proceeding against the govt officer - Punishment of withholding of 10% of monthly pension for a period of three years - misconduct - failure to maintain absolute integrity - The Bombay High Court in 2024 quashed the punishment order dated April 26, 2013, against a petitioner, which had imposed a withholding of 10% of monthly pension for three years, as well as the judgment dated January 23, 2020, by the Central Administrative Tribunal. The court found that the punishment was not sustainable due to the absence of proof of grave misconduct or pecuniary loss to the government, and that there was no violation of the specified Conduct Rules under which the petitioner was charged.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Disciplinary proceeding against the govt officer - Punishment of ...

Court Overturns Pension Withholding for Officer; No Evidence of Misconduct or Conduct Rules Breach Found.

March 9, 2024

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

You may also like:

Jurisdiction - Constitutional Validity of Rule 9(3)(b) of the Chartered Accountants’ (Procedure of Investigation of Professional and Other Misconduct and Conduct of...

Bogus sundry creditors - Whether CIT(A) had clearly violated the provisions of Rule 46A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, while admitting additional evidence? - The High...

HC allowed the appeal, setting aside ITAT's order rejecting additional evidence under Rule 29. The court found ITAT committed a legal error by summarily dismissing the...

Challenge to suspension order of State GST officer for issuing refund to a fake exporter without proper verification. Petitioner contests suspension citing lack of...

Anti-Profiteering - Initiation and conduct of proceedings - Rule 129 of the CGST Rules, 2017 as amended

The High Court considered a case involving professional misconduct u/s Clause (7) of the Chartered Accountants Act. The issue was the validity of the Appellate...

Withholding of Pension - A person cannot be deprived of this pension without the authority of law, which was the Constitutional mandate enshrined in Article 300 A of the...

A disciplinary inquiry, it is well settled, is not governed by the strict rules of evidence which govern a criminal trial. A charge of misconduct in a disciplinary...

Levy of Merchant Overtime Fee - the High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the Tribunal's decision to levy MOT charges for utilizing the services of...

In a dishonored cheque case, the SC overturned the High Court's decision, ruling that the complainant is not obligated at the threshold to prove financial capacity to...

Validity of reopening of assessment - Enquiry to be conducted before issuance of a notice by the AO u/s 148A(a) - The High court found that conducting an inquiry before...

Power to conduct service tax audit / Revenue Audit – Validity of Rule 5A of Service Tax Rules, 1994 - Supreme Court stayed the order of High Court - SC

The Delhi High Court upheld the order quashing of the disciplinary proceedings against the Regional Director (NR) of ROC, emphasizing the distinction between executive...

SC affirmed the Trial Court's conviction of the accused for bribery offenses under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988....

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

Quick Updates: