Revision u/s 263 - Bogus expenditure towards sub-contract ...

Income Tax

March 12, 2024

Revision u/s 263 - Bogus expenditure towards sub-contract payments made to persons who were previously employed in the assessee’s company as supervisors / garage in-charge for monthly salaries - The Tribunal observed that the AO did not examine payments to subcontractors during assessment proceedings. - The details of sub-contracts were not verified, and claims by the assessee were accepted without inquiry. - The ITAT found the AO's actions to be erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. - Hence, the proceedings under section 263 were rightly initiated.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - Bogus expenditure towards sub-contract ...

Income Tax

March 12, 2024

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - expenditure on purchased CDs on Jain Religion - AO had carried out detailed enquiries and taken a plausible view and accepted the assessee's treatment...

Revision u/s 254 - NP estimation on turnover - Bogus bills for purchase of diamonds - it is nothing, but a bogus claim of expenditure recorded in the books of accounts...

Revision u/s 263 - AO though made inquiry about the claim made by the assessee, however, not discussed the same while passing assessment order. - It can be seen from the...

Invocation of section 263 of the Act – Allowability of the expenditure - scope of deeper inquiry to be conducted by AO - revision upheld - AT

Validity of Revision u/s 263 by CIT - payments made to persons specified under Section 40A(2)(b) allowed in assessment order - there is a finding by the Tribunal, as...

Revision u/s 263 - CIT has merely directed the Assessing Officer to make an elaborate inquiry. - revision is not valid - AT

Revision u/s 263 - bogus liability towards purchases - payment in expenditure cash during the next year - The implications, if any, in respect of discharge of liability...

Revision u/s 263 - Explanation 2 to section 263 (Deeming erroneous order) is applicable only when there is no enquiry made by the Assessing Officer.

Revision u/s 263 - when assessee company made a bogus claim of expenditure then the assessee cannot avail immunity from tax liability by stating that the impugned amount...

Revision u/s 263 - AO allowed of the assessee‟s claim for deduction of forfaiting charges as revenue expenditure - as the A.O while framing the assessment had...

Quick Updates: