Seeking waiving off the payment of Court fees - economic ...

Appellant Denied Court Fee Waiver; NCLAT Rules Misleading Representation Not Grounds for Fee Exemption.

March 18, 2024

Case Laws Companies Law AT

Seeking waiving off the payment of Court fees - economic hardship or other significant reasons - Refiling the Compensation Application against the order of the Competition Commission of India - The NCLAT found no such hardship or reason was presented that justified waiving the fee, despite the appellant's claim of being misled by their previous representative. - The NCLAT distinguished these cases from the present situation, noting that in those cases, the legal representatives' absence or default led to the proceedings' outcomes. In contrast, in the current case, the representative was present and actively participated, even though he was not authorized to practice law. Thus, the rationale of not penalizing the party for the representative's fault did not apply here as the representative's actions were not mere defaults or absences but involved active, albeit unauthorized, participation.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Seeking waiving off the payment of Court fees - economic ...

Appellant Denied Court Fee Waiver; NCLAT Rules Misleading Representation Not Grounds for Fee Exemption.

March 18, 2024

Case Laws Companies Law AT

You may also like:

Rule 48 of the NCLAT Rules clearly stipulates service of notice on the other side, pursuant to issuance of notice by the NCLAT in the appeal, regardless of supply of...

Blocking of input tax credit - Since the appellant-assessee did not have the benefit of the reasons on what ground the order under Rule 86-A was passed, the...

Maintainability of appeal before NCLAT - applicability of time limitation - A sleight of interpretation of procedural rules cannot be used to defeat the substantive...

Seeking condonation delay of 41 days in filing the present appeal - Sufficient reasons for delay or not - initiation of CIRP - Despite the appellant's claim of lack of...

Interpretation of statute - whether "Certified Copy" prescribed for preferring an appeal could substitute "Certified Free Copy" provided u/r 50? Held: Issue dealt with...

The ITAT ruled that Portfolio Management Service (PMS) fees paid by the appellant to portfolio managers qualify as expenses "wholly and exclusively incurred in...

NCLAT addressed the computation of limitation periods for filing appeals under IBC. The tribunal held that while the 30-day limitation period under Section 61 can be...

The Appellant contended that its claim should be treated as a secured debt u/s 30 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), rather than as an unsecured debt. However,...

The NCLAT erred in invoking its inherent powers u/r 11 of the NCLAT Rules 2016 to approve a settlement between the second respondent and the Corporate Debtor,...

Levy of Penalty and late fee for delayed payment of service tax and delayed filing of return - penalties u/s 76, 77 & 78 waived in view of section 73(3) - Since, there...

Export of services or not - Reversal of Credit - The fundamental charge that the service recipients are ‘other establishments’ of service providers in terms of in terms...

The NCLAT rejected the intervention application filed by the Appellant for approval of the Resolution Plan u/s 30 of the I&B Code. The Appellant was an unsuccessful...

Power of tribunal to review application - It is the well laid down proposition of law that ‘in the absence of any power of ‘Review’ or ‘Recall’ vested with the...

Levy of service tax - The appellant is not liable to pay service tax on Export Pass fee, Import Pass fee, Permit fee, Excise Staff Salary and overtime allowances/charges...

Classification of services - Fee from parks - Market fee-daily - Market fee-weekly - Fees for bays in bus stand (bus stand entrance fee collection) - Bus -stand...

Quick Updates: