Time limitation - Refusal to condone the delay in challenging ...

Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision, Rejects Late Appeal Due to Missed Deadline and Lack of Justification.

April 13, 2024

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

Time limitation - Refusal to condone the delay in challenging the Order passed by the Competent Authority and Administrator, SAFEM(FOP)A, 1976 and NDPS Act, 1985, New Delhi - In this case, the court found that the appeal was filed significantly beyond even the extended 60-day period, with no compelling justification provided for the delay. Consequently, the court upheld the Appellate Tribunal's decision not to entertain the appeal, citing a plethora of judgments that reinforced the sanctity of statutory deadlines in legal proceedings.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Time limitation - Refusal to condone the delay in challenging ...

Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision, Rejects Late Appeal Due to Missed Deadline and Lack of Justification.

April 13, 2024

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

You may also like:

Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court...

The Calcutta High Court considered a case involving the clandestine removal of wire rods and the levy of a penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The...

The High Court rejected the petition challenging SEBI's decision to not accept the settlement applications. The petitioner's documents were deficient, and it failed to...

The High Court rejected the appeal filed by the applicant due to lack of reasons for enhancing turnover, non-consideration of material evidence, and failure to obtain...

Addition u/s 68 - ITAT confirmed the additions - The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, affirming the dismissal of the appeal. It concurred with the Tribunal's...

The Delhi High Court addressed a case involving money laundering and illegal kidney transplantation conspiracy. The court emphasized that bail can be challenged and...

Deduction u/s 54 - It is settled law that when on an issue there is no jurisdictional High Court decision other Hon’ble High Court decision has to be followed by...

Power of Tribunal when it disagree with earlier decision of Tribunal - there are only two methods to disagree is either the decision is per in-curium or the decision is...

Doctrine of Merger of High Court Decision with the Order of Supreme Court - The Jharkhand High Court, in its analysis, delved into the doctrine of merger, a pivotal...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of classifying imported Zinc as unwrought/unrefined under a specific customs tariff heading. The Tribunal rejected the demand...

The case pertains to the rectification of a mistake and reopening of assessment u/s 147 versus assessment u/s 153C. The information or seized document belonging to the...

In a recent High Court case, the issue of whether advertisement expenditure could be considered as allowable revenue expenditure was discussed. The ITAT allowed the...

The High Court declined to issue general directions to all Motor Accident Claims Tribunals in Gujarat regarding the uniform procedure for deduction of TDS in MACP...

The High Court addressed the issue of extending stay beyond 365 days by ITAT under the third proviso to Section 254(2A) with the 2008 Finance Act amendment. The...

Scope of challenge to orders passed by the ITSC - Validity of exercising discretion by the ITSC in granting relief to the assessee - Granting immunity from prosecution...

Quick Updates: