The ITAT upheld the assessee's claim for expenses paid to ...

ITAT ruled in favor of assessee on disallowance of contractor payments. Cash withdrawals explained. Unexplained investment not proven. Sales-tax subsidy allowed.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 8, 2024

The ITAT upheld the assessee's claim for expenses paid to contractors for loading and unloading, as supported by banking transactions and TDS deductions. Contractors confirmed providing labor, and cash withdrawals were for labor payment. The AO's claim of ex-employees as contractors was justified for reliable labor supply. The allegation of unexplained investment in land purchase was dismissed as the deal did not materialize. Sales-tax subsidy was deemed a capital receipt, requiring quantification by the AO. The matter of 14A provisions was remanded to the AO for further examination.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT upheld the assessee's claim for expenses paid to ...

ITAT ruled in favor of assessee on disallowance of contractor payments. Cash withdrawals explained. Unexplained investment not proven. Sales-tax subsidy allowed.

Case Laws Income Tax

June 8, 2024

You may also like:

The ITAT Bangalore addressed unexplained cash deposits u/s 69A, focusing on the credibility of earlier withdrawals as a source for redeposits. The Tribunal examined fund...

Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - transactions and payments made in cash - assessee filed affidavits from sub-contractors of assessee firm and they insisted for cash payments to...

Disallowance under section 40A(3) - Cash purchase - cash payments through truck drivers - According to the assessee, the truck driver acts as an agent of the assessee. -...

Disallowances u/s.40A(3) r.w.r 6DD - payment to agent or not - payment of expenses was made in cash exceeding the stipulated amount - it is seen that the assessee made...

Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - Payment of expenditure in Cash exceeding ₹ 20,000 - whether payment would fall under Rule 6DD(k) of I.T. Rules? - we find force in the...

Addition u/s 40A(3) - cash payment in excess of prescribed limit - Genuineness or otherwise of payment is not a criteria to exclude cash payment in excess of prescribed...

The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered the penalty u/s 271AAA for unexplained cash found during a search. The AO rejected the assessee's submissions due to lack of...

The High Court addressed the issue of disallowance u/s. 80IA(4) to determine if the assessee was a contractor or a developer of infrastructure facilities. The Court...

Unexplained cash payments - There is also no evidence to suggest that cash withdrawn from ETLL was unused and kept with the assessee idle though repeatedly withdrawals...

The ITAT addressed various issues including disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D, where Revenue challenged deletion of disallowance made by AO. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision,...

Validity of the order of ITAT deleting the various additions made by the AO - The appellant, Revenue, contested various additions made by the Assessing Officer,...

Disallowance u/s. 40A(3) - business expediency in payment of cash towards genuine transaction - The contention of the assessee from the day one is that the sellers...

HC held that u/s 40A, cash payments are restricted to prevent false income claims. Exemptions allowed for special circumstances where bank transactions are impossible....

Cash payment for purchase of fruits - the payment in cash for purchase of agricultural commodities is covered by Rule 6DD(e) of the Rules and in such a situation merely...

Disallowance of payment to sub-contractor - disallowance of 10% from the other payments - the contractors had worked and the TDS was made from the payments but the...

Quick Updates: