Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2024 Year 2024 This

The ITAT held that the addition u/s 69C r.w.s.115BBE for ...


ITAT Confirms Addition u/s 69C for Unexplained Import Costs; Assessee Fails to Prove Supplier Relations.

June 11, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The ITAT held that the addition u/s 69C r.w.s.115BBE for unexplained import expenditure was justified as the assessee failed to record the expenditure in the books. Lack of proof of past business relation with China-based supplier raised doubts on credit imports. The payment of custom duty was acknowledged, but the explanation provided did not meet the standard of human probabilities. The assessee's failure to prove import agreement conditions led to dismissal of the appeal. The alternative plea for relief on custom duty was rejected as lower authorities had already granted relief and sec.69C proviso barred further addition. Assessee's appeal was dismissed.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions u/ss 69C and 68 for undisclosed credit card expenditures in foreign currencies based on material found during a survey. The...

  2. The ITAT adjudicated on the following issues: 1. Cost of acquisition for computing long-term capital gains on sale of ancestral agricultural land: The assessee's...

  3. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes in relation to the computation of capital gains arising from the transfer...

  4. Addition on account of diamond set received as gift by the appellant - The CIT(A) accepted the appellant's submission that the diamond set was indeed gifted by his late...

  5. Jurisdictional issue regarding notice u/s 143(2) was addressed, with ITAT holding that the initial notice by ACIT, Circle-5(1), Delhi was within time, and subsequent...

  6. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credits - Onus to prove - CIT(A) deleted addition - The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to discharge its onus of proving the...

  7. Assessee purchased credit cards using unexplained cash payments. AO made addition u/s 69A as assessee failed to explain source of cash. CIT(A) confirmed addition since...

  8. The ITAT held: Long term capital gain was to be computed allowing deduction for indexed cost of acquisition and exemption u/s 54B. Addition u/s 68 for unexplained...

  9. Addition made u/s 153A on account of undisclosed foreign bank account and interest income thereon - assessee confronted with client profiles from HSBC Bank showing...

  10. Protective addition on account of unexplained credit entries appearing in the bank account - assessee company is a conduit - addition on account of unaccounted...

  11. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as unexplained/bogus credits or trading liabilities. The...

  12. ITAT ruled on unexplained purchases under s.69C and unaccounted sales. For unexplained purchases in non-edible oil business, ITAT directed estimation of profit at 8%...

  13. Addition made u/s 69C - Unexplained huge expenditure to earn Agriculture income - once the assessee has not made any investment, the addition made u/s 69C of the Act is illegal.

  14. Disallowance of sales commission paid to two Associated Enterprises (AEs) being foreign entities - assessee failed to discharge the onus of proving legitimate business...

  15. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained credit - Onus to prove - share capital introduced - the assessee failed to explain the sources of investment of cash of Rs. 10 lacs each by...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates