The HC quashed the order blacklisting the petitioner company for ...

Tripura High Court Overturns Company Blacklisting Post-Insolvency Resolution, Citing Disproportionate Impact and Judicial Review Necessity.

January 10, 2025

Case Laws IBC HC

The HC quashed the order blacklisting the petitioner company for 3 years and debarring it from participating in future tenders by the Government of Tripura. Approving the resolution plan under the I&B Code aims to revive the corporate debtor as a going concern with a clean slate. Blacklisting post-resolution would defeat this objective and be disproportionate after forfeiture of the performance bank guarantee. The plea against blacklisting was not entertained by the Arbitral Tribunal. Denying judicial review would amount to denying a legal remedy. The order of blacklisting was quashed to uphold the I&B Code's aim of corporate revival.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The HC quashed the order blacklisting the petitioner company for ...

Tripura High Court Overturns Company Blacklisting Post-Insolvency Resolution, Citing Disproportionate Impact and Judicial Review Necessity.

January 10, 2025

Case Laws IBC HC

You may also like:

The case pertains to the extinguishment of claims under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, after the acceptance of the...

Direction issued to the Appellant / ROC, West Bengal to restore the name of the Company for completion of ‘Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process’ effectively in the...

HC ruled that ex-parte tax assessment against a corporate debtor post-CIRP resolution plan approval is impermissible. The court held that once the NCLT approves a...

SC adjudicated a dispute concerning the executability of an arbitral award post-corporate insolvency resolution plan. The Court held that upon NCLT's approval of the...

The case involves an appeal before CESTAT regarding continuation post Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under IBC, 2016. NCLT approved a Resolution Plan...

External Commercial Borrowings (ECB) Policy – ECB facility for Resolution Applicants under Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

Resolution professional doesn’t require nod of shareholders/members for insolvency resolution

The IBBI has issued a notification amending the Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons Regulations, 2016, specifically modifying Schedule-I, Form H...

The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the Resolution Plan submitted by the Resolution Applicant did not violate any provisions of law, including Regulation 37(ba)...

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, addressed the validity of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a...

Initiation of insolvency resolution of a personal guarantor of the Corporate debtors - The law doesn't envisage that the insolvency resolution of the personal guarantor...

This case deals with the extinguishment of demands due to the non-filing of claims by the revenue during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the...

CESTAT (Appellate Tribunal) addressed whether appeals continue post initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and approval of Resolution plan u/s...

Withdrawal/modification of approved Resolution Plan - Section 31(1) of IBC - The Supreme Court addressed cross-appeals concerning the approval of a resolution plan under...

NCLAT dismissed an appeal concerning pre-CIRP electricity dues, affirming NCLT's jurisdiction over post-resolution plan disputes under IBC Section 60(5). The Tribunal...

Quick Updates: