Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2025 Year 2025 This

HC allowed the petition, finding a violation of natural justice ...


Judicial Review Exposes Procedural Gaps in Tax Penalty Application, Mandates Comprehensive Reasoning Under Section 74 CGST Act

April 11, 2025

Case Laws     GST     HC

HC allowed the petition, finding a violation of natural justice due to lack of proper application of mind by the respondent authority under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court directed the Commissioner to review orders lacking substantive reasoning for invoking fraud provisions, specifically mandating explicit documentation of willful misstatement or material fact suppression. The judicial intervention emphasized procedural integrity by requiring comprehensive rationale when applying statutory penalties, effectively remanding the matter for comprehensive reconsideration and appropriate administrative action.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. HC exercised judicial discretion under Section 311 Cr.PC, rejecting petitioner's attempt to recall witnesses. The court found no substantive grounds for reopening...

  2. Review petition - Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Tribunal sustaining the levy without providing an opportunity of hearing - Review applicant had paid entire tax amount...

  3. Scope of Judicial Review – Review of the decision of the Settlement Commission - There is limited scope of judicial review - Despite such narrow confines of judicial...

  4. SC remanded the matter to HC, directing expedited review of an ex-parte assessment reopening order. The court mandated HC to adjudicate the pending review petition...

  5. ITAT determined that Section 249(4)(b) was inapplicable due to specific procedural circumstances. The tribunal found the statutory requirements for advance tax payment...

  6. Review of Order after gap of 13 years - delay can be condoned or not - There is a period of one year provided as per the Act, 2003 for seeking review of any order passed...

  7. HC quashed the summary order in GST DRC-07 for procedural irregularities, specifically violation of natural justice principles. The court found the tax authority passed...

  8. Section 90 of the Income Tax Act allows relief from double taxation by granting foreign tax credits (FTCs) on foreign income taxed in both India and the other country....

  9. SC upheld constitutional validity of arrest powers under Customs Act and GST Acts while establishing key procedural safeguards. Person arrested has right to meet...

  10. The High Court held that while exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, it does not assume the role of an appellate authority to conduct a merit...

  11. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the words are clean and simple and in order to expose the assessee to the penalty, unless the case is strictly covered by the Proviso, the...

  12. Provisional attachment of Bank Accounts - lack of application of mind - In the event, the Commissioner refuses to lift the orders of provisional attachment once again,...

  13. The AT dismissed the review applications filed for waiver of pre-deposit of penalties under FERA. The appellants' failure to comply with the deposit order justified the...

  14. This case pertains to the precedence and priority of consideration between an application filed u/s 54(C) and Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)...

  15. The High Court held that the impugned Press Release by the Ministry of Finance, purporting to direct judicial and quasi-judicial authorities to classify all...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates