ITAT adjudicated two key issues involving capital account and ...

Capital Account Dispute Resolved: Tribunal Rejects Mechanical Tax Additions Without Substantive Evidence

May 2, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT adjudicated two key issues involving capital account and sundry creditors. The tribunal found material misunderstandings by the Assessing Officer regarding capital account balances, distinguishing between personal and business balance sheets. Regarding sundry creditors, the tribunal determined the change was merely nomenclature without substantive financial alteration. ITAT comprehensively set aside CIT(A)'s order, directing the Assessing Officer to delete both contested additions. The tribunal critically emphasized proper fact appreciation and rejected mechanical additions without substantive evidence. The final outcome was decisively in favor of the assessee, effectively nullifying the disputed tax assessments.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT adjudicated two key issues involving capital account and ...

Capital Account Dispute Resolved: Tribunal Rejects Mechanical Tax Additions Without Substantive Evidence

May 2, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal examined the determination of net profits from contract business, rejection of books of accounts, and addition u/s 40(a)(ia) for...

ITAT adjudicated a dispute involving an Asset Reconstruction Company's tax treatment of security receipts. The tribunal held that the assessee correctly followed RBI...

The CIT(A) partly allowed and restricted the addition on account of commission expenses at 0.25% as compared to 2% adopted by the Assessing Officer. The coordinate bench...

The provisions of section 69A allow for additions if the assessee is found to be the owner of unrecorded money, bullion, jewelry, or valuable articles. However, when...

Addition made u/s 153A on account of undisclosed foreign bank account and interest income thereon - assessee confronted with client profiles from HSBC Bank showing...

Assessee showed higher wastage of 13.04% on consumption of worsted yarn compared to 8.66% in previous year. AO made addition for excessive shortage and scrap value of...

IT, Estimation of income without rejecting books of accounts is arbitrary, addition made by AO deleted

Additions on various grounds during post search Assessment u/s 153A - The ITAT's decision showcases a detailed analysis of each issue, balancing the need for legal...

Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

The assessee, a foreign company, earned network transportation fees from its Indian associated enterprise (AE), Damco India Private Limited (DIPL). The Assessing Officer...

The assessee claimed that no capital gain was chargeable on receipt from transfer of trademark as there was no cost of acquisition. However, the tribunal held that the...

Trading addition - Estimation of income - bogus purchases - when purchased are duly accepted by the VAT Department including the sales and manufacturing account and the...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that an appeal cannot be dismissed solely on the ground of non-filing of return or non-payment of advance tax when the entire...

The case involved a dispute over the tax rate applicable on Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) from the sale of unlisted shares u/s 112(1)(c) of the Act. The Appellate...

Quick Updates: