ITAT held that the transfer pricing order dated 12.01.2015 ...

Transfer Pricing Order Quashed: Invalid Assessment Beyond Time Limit Invalidates Extended Deadline for Final Order Under Sections 143(3) and 144C

May 6, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT held that the transfer pricing order dated 12.01.2015 merged into the final assessment order dated 20.04.2015 for AY 2011-12 was quashed by CIT(A) as being passed in a non-existent entity's name. Consequently, the extended 12-month time limit for passing the final assessment order was invalid. The assessment order dated 12.05.2015 was beyond the prescribed limitation period of 31.03.2015. The tribunal ruled that the impugned order under section 143(3) read with section 144C was time-barred and liable to be quashed, thereby allowing the assessee's challenge to the order's validity.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT held that the transfer pricing order dated 12.01.2015 ...

Transfer Pricing Order Quashed: Invalid Assessment Beyond Time Limit Invalidates Extended Deadline for Final Order Under Sections 143(3) and 144C

May 6, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Time limit to pass assessment u/s. 92CA(3) - Transfer pricing adjustments - After thorough consideration of the statutory provisions and legal arguments presented by...

The Transfer Pricing Officer's order was held invalid as it was issued beyond the time limit prescribed u/s 92CA(3A) of the Act read with Section 153. The ITAT ruled...

HC held that assessment orders for tax years 2014-2015 and 2016-2017 were time-barred under Rule 14A (5A), which mandates assessments must be completed within four years...

The final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 147 read with Section 144C(13) for the Assessment Year 2016-17 is quashed as barred by limitation. Except...

The case pertains to the jurisdiction of impugned orders under the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017, and the time limitation u/s 73 and Section 44 of the Act. The key points are:...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the final assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 144C(4) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of time limit for issuance of Transfer Pricing (TP) Order u/s 92CA(3A). Referring to a case law, it was held that the TP...

Limitation for passing a assessment order - Consequential order passed by the assessing authority beyond the time limit specified u/s 153 (2A) - The High Court examined...

The case pertains to the scope of limited scrutiny by the assessing officer regarding computation of capital gains u/s 45 and providing exemption u/s 54B of the Income...

This case involves a challenge to an order of re-assessment under the relevant tax laws. The key points are: The petitioner failed to submit monthly returns within the...

Impugned proceedings u/s 147 were held invalid as the notice u/s 148 was issued beyond the time limit prescribed u/s 149. The Tribunal interpreted the amended provisions...

Limit limit to pass order u/s. 201(1)/201(1A) - default for non-deduction of tax at source (TDS) - A subsequent amendment to the provision cannot give a new lease of...

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

HC ruled that time limits under Section 144C(13) for completing assessments following DRP directions are mandatory, not directory. The AO must pass orders within one...

Validity of order u/s 92CA - time limit for passing of the TPO order - period of limitation - despite the fact that the reference made to the Ld. TPO is valid, in...

Quick Updates: