CESTAT dismissed the application for rectification of mistake in ...

Judicial Review Rejects Error Claim in Product Classification Dispute, Upholds Original Order's Substantive Findings

May 20, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

CESTAT dismissed the application for rectification of mistake in Final Order No. 58770 of 2024. The Tribunal held that the alleged error in comparing product features did not constitute a "mistake apparent from record" as per established judicial precedent. The comparison required complex reasoning and could potentially yield multiple interpretations. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant, through new counsel, was essentially seeking a re-hearing disguised as a mistake rectification application. Consequently, the application was denied and consigned to records, maintaining the original order's integrity without substantive modification.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT dismissed the application for rectification of mistake in ...

Judicial Review Rejects Error Claim in Product Classification Dispute, Upholds Original Order's Substantive Findings

May 20, 2025

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Initiation of CIRP process - application was rejected on the ground that the claim of the Appellant falls within the ambit of disputed claim - Merely disputing a claim...

Review petition - error on record - power to correct - earlier judgment suffers from error apparent on the face of record and is liable to be recalled/reviewed. The...

The HC upheld the Tribunal's classification of the product as "Rusk" under Entry 77B instead of "Bread" under Entry 34, finding it to be hardened/toasted bread. The HC...

CESTAT determined Natural Beta Carotene Powder's classification under Customs Tariff Act, 1975. While appellant sought classification under TI 3203 00 20 (industrial...

Seeking review - error apparent on the face of record or not - The High Court held that, these documents were not part of the pleadings. Review does not mean rehearing...

Refund claim of service tax paid - classification of services - Claiming a refund of the amount paid as tax as per their understanding of law cannot be disputed now -...

A review application is maintainable on (i) discovery of new and important evidence which could not be produced earlier despite due diligence, (ii) mistake or error...

CESTAT upheld the classification of mixed spice products (including Pav Bhaji spice mix) under Tariff Item No. 09109100 rather than under Tariff Item No. 21039040 as...

The ITAT allowed the assessee's claim for deduction of ESOP expenditure, directing the AO to follow the binding precedents of the Karnataka HC and ITAT Special Bench on...

The High Court held that the impugned Press Release by the Ministry of Finance, purporting to direct judicial and quasi-judicial authorities to classify all...

Scope of Judicial Review – Review of the decision of the Settlement Commission - There is limited scope of judicial review - Despite such narrow confines of judicial...

Classification of goods - In any case all the show cause notices were issued only on and after 30.08.1995, raising a classification dispute, after having approved the...

Review petition dismissed for lack of grounds permissible under law. Court found no mistake or error apparent on record to warrant review of the impugned order passed...

Petition challenging validity of reopening assessment u/s 148 dismissed. No final order passed, jurisdictional issue raised for first time in review petition. Statutory...

Classification dispute regarding imported goods such as brake pads, mold tools, etc. Tribunal upheld classification under CTH 6813 8900, rejecting importer's claim for...

Quick Updates: