The ITAT invalidated the assessment order due to procedural ...

Jurisdictional Defect Nullifies Tax Assessment: Procedural Flaws Invalidate Capital Gains Deduction Under Section 127

May 20, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT invalidated the assessment order due to procedural irregularities in jurisdictional transfer. The tribunal found that the assessment proceedings under Section 143(3) were initiated by one assessing officer but completed by another without a mandatory transfer order under Section 127. The tribunal disallowed capital gains deductions claimed by the appellant, observing that the transaction documents were self-manufactured, lacking genuine corroborative evidence. The ledger entries and unregistered agreements were deemed insufficient to substantiate the claimed expenses. Consequently, the assessment order was quashed for want of valid jurisdictional assumption, effectively nullifying the tax assessment.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT invalidated the assessment order due to procedural ...

Jurisdictional Defect Nullifies Tax Assessment: Procedural Flaws Invalidate Capital Gains Deduction Under Section 127

May 20, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Del HC held assessment order issued in name of Cairn India Limited after its amalgamation with Vedanta Limited was fundamentally void and not rectifiable under s.154 or...

HC set aside GST assessment order due to absence of assessing officer's signature, holding it as a fatal procedural defect. The court determined that signature...

HC held that under Sections 292B and 292BB of the Income Tax Act, the assessee cannot challenge the validity of a notice u/s 143(2) or assessment order u/s 143(3) after...

HC held assessment order invalid due to fundamental procedural defects in implementing Faceless Assessment Scheme. Original order failed to qualify as Draft Assessment...

HC nullified best judgment assessment under GST due to procedural irregularities. The court found the assessment order invalid as the tax authority failed to issue...

Validity of assessment order pursuant to order u/s 144C - there is no direction given by the ld. DRP to ld. Assessing Officer but the directions were only given to the...

Non following Procedure laid down u/s 144C - Action of the AO/NeAC not proposing all the variation in the Draft Assessment Order - The Tribunal agrees with the...

HC set aside GST assessment proceedings due to absence of Document Identification Number (DIN). Following established precedents and CBIC Circular No.128/47/2019-GST...

ITAT quashed the assessment order under sections 153A/153C, finding the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax's approval mechanically granted without substantive application...

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to procedural irregularities in sanctioning authority under section 151. The tribunal found that the approval for reopening...

ITAT quashed assessment orders under Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance....

HC invalidated reassessment proceedings against the petitioner under Section 148A, finding a critical procedural defect. The AO's notice failed to substantiate the claim...

Assessment u/s 153C/153A - Computation of the Relevant Assessment Years Block - Jurisdiction for Reopening Assessments - The Delhi High Court meticulously analyzed the...

HC dismissed writ petitions challenging tax reassessment order. The AO had initially issued an order with procedural defects, which were subsequently cured through a...

HC held assessment proceedings invalid where conducted against non-existent company post-merger. Despite AO's awareness of merger during assessment and in original...

Quick Updates: