HC allowed the petitioner's appeal, finding the refund claim ...

Petitioner's Refund Claim Reinstated: Appellate Authority Ordered to Conduct Independent, Unbiased Review of Case Merits

May 29, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

HC allowed the petitioner's appeal, finding the refund claim rejection erroneous. The Appellate Authority improperly dismissed the appeal based solely on administrative rank similarities between respondents. The court held that the 1st respondent, functioning as an Appellate Authority, should have independently reviewed the case merits without being influenced by the 2nd respondent's administrative communications. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration in accordance with legal principles, ensuring a fair and independent review of the petitioner's refund claim.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC allowed the petitioner's appeal, finding the refund claim ...

Petitioner's Refund Claim Reinstated: Appellate Authority Ordered to Conduct Independent, Unbiased Review of Case Merits

May 29, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Disbursal of refund amount - action of withholding of the petitioner/assessee’s claim of refund in question by the respondent CGST authority and not refunding the same...

HC set aside the appellate authority's order dated 11th December, 2023 rejecting the petitioner's refund application. The court remanded the matter for fresh hearing,...

HC directed state authorities to process petitioner's GST refund claim promptly following verification of facts and entitlement. Decision must consider state...

GST registration of petitioner cancelled by respondent for alleged violation of Rule 86B of CGST Rules, 2017 without providing details, particulars or conducting...

The HC disposed of the petition directing State Authorities to immediately process the petitioner's GST refund claim after verification of facts and entitlement. The...

Clandestine manufacture and recovery of Central Excise Duty along with interest and penalty - suppression of facts and misrepresentation alleged against petitioner -...

The appellants claimed that the entire amount of service tax paid by them should be considered as a deposit u/s 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and sought a refund....

The High Court held that the revisional authority's order placing the refund sanction order in abeyance u/s 108 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was...

Principles of Natural justice - late filing of return - intent to evade or not - it is the case of petitioner is that various aspects have not been dealt with or...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

The High Court quashed the order rejecting the refund claim of the petitioner, an SEZ Unit, on the ground that the petitioner was not allowed to claim a refund under the...

HC directed state authorities to process petitioner's GST refund claim promptly following inaction on previous requests. The authorities must verify facts, assess...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

Refund of duty paid - filing of refund claim before the wrong jurisdiction - if the adjudicating authority was of the view that the appellant has not filed refund claim...

The High Court set aside the orders rejecting the petitioner's refund claims for excess tax paid in different assessment years on the ground of time limitation. The...

Quick Updates: