HC held that the detained gold jewellery, being personal effects ...

Passenger's Gold Jewellery Exempted from Customs Detention Due to Procedural Lapses in Statutory Notice Requirements

May 30, 2025

Case Laws Customs HC

HC held that the detained gold jewellery, being personal effects worn by the passenger, is exempt from customs detention under applicable baggage rules. The customs department failed to issue a show cause notice within the prescribed statutory period of six months, with an additional six-month extension. Consequently, the detention is deemed impermissible, and the jewellery must be released. The court's ruling emphasizes strict compliance with procedural requirements and protects the passenger's rights to personal effects during international travel.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC held that the detained gold jewellery, being personal effects ...

Passenger's Gold Jewellery Exempted from Customs Detention Due to Procedural Lapses in Statutory Notice Requirements

May 30, 2025

Case Laws Customs HC

You may also like:

HC ruled in favor of a Russian tourist regarding customs detention of a gold chain. The court established three key principles: (1) bona fide personal jewelry falls...

HC held that detention of personal gold jewellery was illegal due to procedural irregularities. No Show Cause Notice was issued and no personal hearing was granted,...

The High Court held that personal jewellery which is not newly acquired during an overseas trip, but rather has been a used personal effect carried by the passenger,...

Customs officials seized gold jewelry from petitioners on 23-02-2023. Section 110(2) of Customs Act, 1962 mandates issuing show cause notice u/s 124 within six months of...

HC finds gold kada constitutes personal effect under Baggage Rules, 2016, exempting Petitioner from detention. Based on photographic evidence and established precedents...

HC ruled in favor of petitioner, ordering release of seized gold jewelry within 7 days. The court determined that Baggage Rules 2016 provision regarding items "carried...

The HC set aside the Order-in-Original detaining petitioner's gold jewelry, finding violations of natural justice principles as no proper hearing was afforded and...

HC invalidated confiscation orders regarding seized gold ornaments worn by petitioners at arrival. Court found multiple procedural violations: no show cause notice...

The High Court held that the personal gold jewelry, consisting of a necklace and bracelet weighing 0.178 grams, worn by a tourist traveling from Azerbaijan to India,...

Import of gold / gold jewellery - passing through green channel - As per Section 79 (2) read with Baggage Rules, 1998 the benefit can be extended to the passenger who...

The HC ruled that detention of personal jewelry (two gold kadas and two gold chains) from a traveler's baggage was impermissible. The court held that waiver of show...

HC ruled that gold bangles worn by a passenger returning to India do not constitute "baggage" under the Customs Act 1962 and Baggage Rules 2016. The court determined...

Amendments to the AIRs of Duty Drawback on Gold Jewellery, Silver Jewellery and Silver Articles

CBIC has established a harmonized procedure for import/export through personal carriage, effective May 1, 2025, focusing on gems and jewellery, samples, and prototypes....

Estimation of income on deficit gold jewellery - in search proceedings AO noted shortage of stock of gold ornaments - It is quite natural to give telescopic benefit to...

Quick Updates: