Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2025 Year 2025 This

CESTAT adjudicated a customs export scheme dispute involving ...


Exporters Win Challenge Against Customs Penalty Under Sections 114(iii) and 114AA Due to Procedural Evidentiary Flaws

June 5, 2025

Case Laws     Customs     AT

CESTAT adjudicated a customs export scheme dispute involving penalty provisions under sections 114(iii) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962. The tribunal ruled that statements recorded under section 108 cannot be considered admissible evidence under section 138B without proper cross-examination procedures. The tribunal found the penalty imposition against the parties was unsupported by substantive evidence, specifically rejecting statements recorded without procedural safeguards. Consequently, the tribunal allowed the appeal, effectively quashing the penalties imposed on the exporters for alleged improper diversion of goods under the Focus Market Scheme.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty on CHA u/s 114 (iii) and Section 114AA respectively of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abatement - fraudulent export to claim duty drawback - The...

  2. CESTAT appellate proceedings involving export documentation and customs regulations. The tribunal examined issues of jurisdictional scope under section 28AAA of the...

  3. CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the Principal Commissioner's order dated 09.03.2022. The tribunal held that the customs authority lacked jurisdiction to invoke...

  4. CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the Principal Commissioner's order dated 29.05.2019. The tribunal held that the customs authority lacked jurisdiction to invoke...

  5. CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside the Principal Commissioner's order dated 29.05.2019. The tribunal found lack of jurisdiction in invoking section 28AAA without...

  6. Levy of penalty u/s 114 (iii) and Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - To constitute a criminal offence of abetment as punishable as defined under Section 107 of...

  7. The penalty imposed u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on the appellant (a Customs Broker) for abetting the clearance of undeclared/mis-declared export goods was...

  8. CESTAT allowed the appeal, setting aside penalties imposed under sections 114(iii) and 114AA of the Customs Act. The tribunal found that statements recorded under...

  9. Levy of penalty u/s 114 and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - Personal penalty on General Manger of the Customs Broker - not verifying genuineness of the exporter and his...

  10. Levy of penalty u/s 114(iii) of the Customs Act, 1962 and Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - export of goods at highly over invoiced values - availing undue export...

  11. Levy of penalty on the appellants u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 - Customs Broker firm - A Custom Broker is supposed to safeguard the interests of both exporters and...

  12. Levy of penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on Customs Broker - All the allegations if any, would fall under the Customs Broker Licensing Regulations. No...

  13. CESTAT upheld confiscation of 1194 gold bangles (54096 gms valued at Rs.16,10,43,792/-) under Section 113(k) of Customs Act for diversion of export consignment. The...

  14. Rejection of declared F.O.B. value and imposition of penalty u/ss 114(iii) and 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 upheld. Market enquiry conducted in presence of appellant's...

  15. Levy of penalty u/s 114 (iii) of Customs Act on the former Assistant Commissioner of customs - Abetting in export of overvalued goods in order to avail inadmissible...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates