Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2025 Year 2025 This

ITAT adjudicated multiple transfer pricing issues, primarily ...


Syngene's Transfer Pricing Battle: Comparables, AMP Expenses, and Margins Scrutinized in Complex Tax Dispute

June 6, 2025

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

ITAT adjudicated multiple transfer pricing issues, primarily focusing on comparability and arm's length pricing. The tribunal upheld the deletion of AMP expenditure additions, finding no international transaction. The court rejected Syngene International Limited as a comparable due to unavailable segmental information. Sequent Research Limited was accepted as a valid comparable. Regarding interest on external commercial borrowings, the tribunal remanded the matter to obtain proper credit ratings, agreeing that LIBOR was an appropriate benchmarking method. The TP adjustment on raw material purchases was deleted after analyzing gross margins, with the assessee's margin of 54.59% deemed acceptable compared to the comparable companies' median of 35.28%. Most revenue grounds were dismissed, with appeals allowed for statistical purposes.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The ITAT allowed the taxpayer's appeal, directing the exclusion of multiple comparables from transfer pricing analysis due to functional dissimilarity, related party...

  2. ITAT ruled on transfer pricing methodology for chemical product distribution, focusing on functional comparability rather than product similarity. The tribunal...

  3. ITAT adjudicated transfer pricing dispute regarding comparable company selection. The tribunal determined the Arm's Length Price (ALP) computation by the Transfer...

  4. Tribunal's conclusion that Resale Price Method (RPM) is the most appropriate method upheld. Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) and Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) had...

  5. HC determined that AMP expenditure does not constitute a separate international transaction requiring transfer pricing adjustment. The Tribunal consistently applied...

  6. TP Adjustment - selection of most appropriate method (MAM) - Resale Price Method or Transactional Net Margin Method - Introduction of Fresh Comparables - Removal of 3%...

  7. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that in determining the arm's length price for transfer pricing adjustments, three companies (MOIAPL, LCAPL, and MOEPAPL)...

  8. ITAT adjudicated transfer pricing dispute regarding software development services benchmarking. The Tribunal comprehensively examined functional comparability, rejecting...

  9. Transfer pricing adjustment made to alleged international transaction of AMP expenditure incurred by assessee disallowed due to lack of evidence that assessee agreed to...

  10. Transfer pricing - arm's length price - Selection of comparable - Other enterprises have claimed depreciation at much lower amounts. Size of the assets besides the age...

  11. ITAT ruled that multiple proposed comparables were inappropriate for transfer pricing analysis due to fundamental differences in business models, product types, and...

  12. The ITAT determined that the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) was the most appropriate method for benchmarking international goods sale/export transactions,...

  13. ITAT ruled AMP expenses did not constitute international transaction under Section 92B, as Revenue failed to establish existence of arrangement between assessee and AE...

  14. Rectification of a mistake apparent from the record u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee had provided specific details and facts regarding the nature of alleged...

  15. Transfer pricing - ALP - Since the operating profit margin of the appellant company is better than those of the comparables, it can be safely concluded that the assessee...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates