Article Section |
|
Home Articles Income Tax Experts This 
|
Submit New Article
|
|
|
Income Tax - Articles - Knowledge sharing |
Showing 1441 to 1460 of 1737 Records |
|
|
USUAL PETTY ADDITIONS IN SCRUTINY ASSESSMENT MAY BE CONTESTED BY FILING APPEAL AND WRITTEN SUBMISSION JUST AFTER RECEIVING ASSESSMENT ORDER.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
February 26, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Correction in OLTAS Income Tax/TDS challan after payment
3 Comments
|
|
By: - AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE
Dated:
February 25, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE
View Profile
|
|
|
Understanding the provisions relating to Transfer Pricing under Income Tax Act 1961
1 Comment
|
|
By: - AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE
Dated:
February 22, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE
View Profile
|
|
|
Past carried forward business loss can be set off against income arising from business or profession though assessable under some other head of income.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
February 21, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
CLAIMS IN RETURN OR OTHERWSE – A NEW APPROACH AND AMENDMETN IS REQUIRED IN VIEW OF E-FILING OF RETURN
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
February 18, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Whether higher stock than actual declared to bank attracts additions u/s 69 of Income Tax Act 1961
|
|
By: - AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE
Dated:
February 16, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE
View Profile
|
|
|
Compulsory maintenece of books of accounts under Income Tax Act
|
|
By: - AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE
Dated:
February 15, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE
View Profile
|
|
|
Provisions of section 40(b) of Income Tax Act 1961
1 Comment
|
|
By: - AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE
Dated:
February 14, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE
View Profile
|
|
|
Wrong approach of tax authorities to brand transactions resulting into loss as bogus or device to avoid tax.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
February 12, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Provisions of Section 269SS and 269T under Income Tax Act 1961
|
|
By: - AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE
Dated:
February 10, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE
View Profile
|
|
|
PRESUMPTIVE INCOME SCHEMES FOR SMALL ASSESSEES UNDER INCOME TAX ACT 1961
1 Comment
|
|
By: - AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE
Dated:
February 8, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE
View Profile
|
|
|
Capital Gains under Income Tax Act 1961
2 Comments
|
|
By: - AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE
Dated:
February 7, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
AMIT BAJAJ ADVOCATE
View Profile
|
|
|
REASSESSMENT ON CHANGE OF OPINION IS NOT PERMISSIBLE
|
|
By: - DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
January 28, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
TRIBUNAL HAS NO POWER TO REVERSE A DECISION ON MERITS
|
|
By: - DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN
Dated:
January 21, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN
View Profile
|
|
|
IMPORTANT TOPIC JUST FOR USE ON REAL TIME BASIS Model statement of facts and grounds of appeal on issue of disallowance under S. 14A
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
January 18, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
MAT: THERE SHOULD NOT BE STIGMA AGAINST ZERO TAX COMPANY OR PERSON OTHER CONTRIBUTIONS SHOULD ALSO BE CONSIDERED.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
January 14, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
DISALLOW WHEN CLAIMED AND ALLOW WHEN NOT CLAIMED – the wrong approach of officers.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
January 13, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Inconsistency in policies relating to PPF deposits by HUF- HUF should be allowed to make deposit in PPF directly and some more suggestions.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
January 4, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
Commission income – Bofors Case – taxability may be decided on the basis of probable normal human conduct, the surrounding circumstances, the preponderance of probabilities and the legal propositions
|
|
By: - Surender Gupta
Dated:
January 4, 2011
|
|
All Articles by:
Surender Gupta
View Profile
|
|
|
Penalty for concealment of income under section 271(1) ( c )- not applicable in case tax payable is imposed by way of MAT.
|
|
By: - DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
Dated:
December 23, 2010
|
|
All Articles by:
DEVKUMAR KOTHARI
View Profile
|
|
|
|
............ |
|