Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2010 (10) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2010 (10) TMI 920 - HC - Companies LawPresent application under section 151 CPC read with Order 39 Rule 2 and 2A CPC made by the applicant/petitioner in a contempt petition seeking directions against the respondents from continuing the contempt on a repetitive basis Held that:- There was no direction issue by CLB against the parties from corresponding with the Government authorities seeking permission /licenses/sanctions in respect of the said land. The directions given by CLB were to maintain status quo and as already observed by this Court this implied that no construction activities and no parting with the possession of said land and no transfer of title should be there. There is no bar on parties in corresponding with authorities and seeking licenses /permissions /approvals of projects from Government in anticipation of succeeding in the litigation. However, it is directed that respondents during pendency of this petition shall not undertake any development activities over the land and shall not part with possession of the land to any third party and shall not transfer title of the land in question to any third party. Obtaining permission by respondents is at their own risk and costs as for that, there was no injunction granted by CLB. However it is made clear that if construction activities are done and status quo is altered, the respondents shall be liable to restore the status of the land as it existed on the date of grant of injunction, at their costs and if it is not done by the respondents and a violation is undertaken by the respondents, the court shall be constrained to restore the position of the land in question as it existed on the date of status quo through Court Commissioner. Thus the present application stands disposed of
|