Home Case Index All Cases VAT and Sales Tax VAT and Sales Tax + HC VAT and Sales Tax - 2013 (4) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2013 (4) TMI 377 - MADRAS HIGH COURTlimitation period - Invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Held that:- The learned counsel for the petitioner made a plea that because of the pendency of the Writ Petition, the limitation period to move the Appellate Authority expired and therefore, he requests time and prayed that the period of pendency of the Writ Petition may be excluded for the purpose of limitation to prefer the appeal before the appellate authority. Considering the said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to move the Appellate Authority within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the Appellate Authority shall entertain the appeal, if the same is in order, and dispose of the appeal, on merits and in accordance with law, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible. However, the period of pendency of this Writ Petition from 23.02.2011 upto the date of filing of the appeal by the petitioner, shall be excluded for the purpose of limitation - Further, the petitioner-Company shall work out their remedy for contesting the delay, if any, for the period of limitation of 30 days prescribed as per law - The Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
|