Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2022 (4) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2022 (4) TMI 1050 - BOMBAY HIGH COURTTermination of services - forfeiture of the entire amount of security deposit - Respondent submitted that no show cause notice was issued to Respondent under the CHALR calling upon Respondent to show cause why they should not be held responsible for lack of adherence to Regulation 19(8) of CHALR - HELD THAT:- Mr. Deshmukh could not dispute this fact because if a show cause notice had been issued, it would have been annexed to the Appeal Memo file. Moreover, COC has not explained as to how termination of its temporary employee Mr. Vijay Dixit would amount to lack of adherence to Regulation 19(8) of CHALR by Respondent. There are no justifiable reason to interfere in the Order of Custom Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal has not committed any perversity or applied incorrect principles to the given facts and when the facts and circumstances are properly analysed and correct test is applied to decide the issue at hand, then that question as pressed do not raises any substantial question of law - Appeal dismissed.
|