Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2023 (5) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2023 (5) TMI 818 - HC - Companies LawPetitioner’s DIN number was incorrectly used - grievance of the Petitioner is that owing to the identity in names, the Petitioner has been wrongly reflected as a Director in Respondent No. 2 company- Katariya Multi Trade Private Limited - HELD THAT:- At the time of the incorporation of Respondent No. 2, the name of Sunil Rawat along with Indore, Madhya Pradesh address was mentioned. However, the DIN number of the Petitioner, who is a resident of Delhi, has been wrongly mentioned. It is this error that needs to be corrected in the records - In the facts and circumstances of the case, when there is no dispute that the DIN number has been wrongly mentioned due to an error of the Company Secretary concerned, the Petitioner cannot be visited with consequences unknown to him and for which he is not to blame. It is accordingly directed that Respondent No. 2 company Kataria Multi Trade Pvt. Ltd. shall be deemed to have been incorporated with the details of Directors given at page 43 of the petition as the correct details of the directors with the DIN numbers. The Petitioner, whose DIN number has been incorrectly used, shall be saddled with no liability in respect of Respondent No. 2 company or its subsidiaries including any of their businesses or activities - If any rectification has to be carried out on the MCA website or ROC, Ahmedabad records, the same shall be done within 4 weeks from the date of filing of an application to this effect. Petition disposed off.
|