9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Dismissal of appeals by AAC on technical grounds. 2. Condonation of delay in payment of undisputed tax. 3. Justification of dismissing appeals by AAC based on non-payment of tax. 4. Consideration of ignorance of law as an excuse for delay. Detailed Analysis: 1. The appeals were filed by the assessee against the order of the AAC, contending that the AAC unjustly dismissed the appeals on technical grounds instead of assessing them on merit. The AAC found discrepancies in the date of receipt of demand notices and concluded that the assessee had not paid the undisputed tax within the allowed time for filing appeals, leading to the dismissal of the appeals for both years. 2. The assessee sought condonation of the delay in payment of tax, arguing that the incorrect date on the demand notices was a mistake made by the clerk of the assessee's counsel. The assessee claimed that due to recent amendments in the law, it was unreasonable to expect immediate awareness of all provisions. The Departmental Representative, however, supported the AAC's decision, emphasizing the obligation of the assessee to comply with tax payment timelines. 3. Upon review, the ITAT acknowledged the clerical error regarding the date of receipt of demand notices and recognized the challenge of staying updated with frequent amendments in tax laws. The ITAT opined that while ignorance of the law is not an excuse, considering the circumstances, the short delay in tax payment should have been condoned by the AAC. The ITAT highlighted the assessee's prompt payment of the undisputed tax after filing the appeals as a crucial factor. 4. Ultimately, the ITAT set aside the AAC's order, directing a reconsideration of the cases on merit, emphasizing the importance of justice. The ITAT deemed it necessary for the AAC to reevaluate the appeals in light of the condonable delay and the overall circumstances. As a result, the appeals were treated as allowed for statistical purposes, indicating a favorable outcome for the assessee.
|
