Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1990 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1990 (5) TMI 125 - AT - Central Excise

Issues:
Classification of 'Gang Saw Blades' imported by the appellants under Chapter heading 82.01/04 or heading 84.45/48.

Detailed Analysis:
1. The issue in this case revolves around the correct classification of 'Gang Saw Blades' imported by the appellants. The department sought to classify them under Chapter heading 82.01/04, while the appellants argued for classification under heading 84.45/48.

2. The appellants, engaged in cutting marble and granite blocks using Gang Saw Machines, imported the blades as replacements. The Assistant Collector initially classified the blades under heading 84.45/48 as machine tools for working metal or stones. However, the Collector (Appeals) directed classification under heading 82.01/04, prompting the appellants to appeal.

3. The appellants contended that the blades, used solely in Gang Saw Machines, do not qualify as 'Hand Tools' under heading 82.01/04. They argued that the blades, being large and heavy, are not hand-operated and are essential components of the Gang Saw Machines.

4. The appellants' advocate referred to various case laws and explanatory notes to support the classification under heading 84.45/48, emphasizing that the blades are integral parts of the Gang Saw Machines, falling under the category of machine tools for working stones.

5. The department's argument focused on the specificity of heading 82.01/04, which covers blades for hand or machine saws. They cited interpretative rules and case laws to support their stance that the blades should be classified under this heading.

6. Despite the appellants' assertion and established practice of classification under heading 84.45/48, the Tribunal analyzed the nature of the blades, their usage in Gang Saw Machines, and the relevant tariff headings. The Tribunal concluded that the blades fit the description of blades for machine saws under heading 82.01/04, emphasizing the specific nature of the classification over the general description under heading 84.45/48.

7. The Tribunal upheld the Collector (Appeals)'s decision, highlighting the specific inclusion of blades for machine saws under heading 82.01/04 and rejecting the appellants' argument that the blades should be classified under heading 84.45/48 as machine tools. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of specific descriptions in tariff headings in determining the correct classification, ultimately dismissing the appeal.

In conclusion, the judgment clarifies the classification of 'Gang Saw Blades' under the relevant tariff headings, emphasizing the specific nature of the classification criteria and the overriding importance of detailed descriptions in determining the appropriate classification for imported goods.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates