Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1996 (9) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1996 (9) TMI 255 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIExtract: ....... the products in dispute are not naphthols and therefore, the clarification given by the Board was not applicable to the products in dispute. 10. emsp Having regard to the above discussions, we hold that the products in dispute shall be classifiable under sub-heading 3204.29. In the result, the appeal is allowed and the impugned order is set aside.
|