1998 (9) TMI 200 - AT - Central Excise

Summary

Issues:
1. Whether Copper Flexible is considered an 'input' under the Modvat scheme for the manufacture of Caustic Soda.

Analysis:
The judgment involves two Revenue appeals against Order-in-Appeal No. 21/90 and Order-in-Appeal No. 22/90-(BM) regarding the classification of Copper Flexible as an 'input' under the Modvat scheme for Caustic Soda production. The Tribunal considered the arguments presented by both parties. The Revenue contended that Copper Flexible should not be equated with an electrode but seen as a conductor, citing divergent decisions on similar matters. The Respondent argued against the Revenue appeals, referencing past decisions where items like anodes and titanium were considered eligible for Modvat credit. The Tribunal examined the role of Copper Flexible in the electrolytic cell used for Caustic Soda production, noting its function as a conductor for passing current and facilitating short circuiting. It was established that Copper Flexible is not consumed in the process like an electrode but requires periodic maintenance due to corrosion or reduced conductivity. The Tribunal differentiated between Copper Flexible and an electrode, emphasizing its role as a connector between the bus-bar and anode, distinct from an anode's function. The judgment also addressed the question of whether Copper Flexible, when welded to the anode, becomes part of the electrode, concluding that it remains an electrical conductor. The Tribunal clarified that the nature of Copper Flexible's role is factual, not a legal issue, and ruled that Modvat credit is not applicable to Copper Flexible as it is deemed an 'appliance' and not an electrode. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the Revenue appeals were allowed.

This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key arguments, considerations, and conclusions made by the Tribunal regarding the classification of Copper Flexible under the Modvat scheme for Caustic Soda manufacturing.