Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2000 (8) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2000 (8) TMI 406 - CEGAT, CHENNAIExtract: .......miner as it did not have any bearing on the issue in question. 6. ensp The explanation given for condonation of delay is not sufficient in terms of the judgment in the case of Tata Yudogawa (supra). We do not find any merits in the application for condonation of delay and hence the application is rejected. Consequently, the appeal is also rejected.
|