Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Section Wise 1969 1969 (1) This

Law	-- All -- GST Income Tax Benami Property Customs Corporate Laws Securities / SEBI Insolvency & Bankruptcy FEMA Law of Competition PMLA Service Tax Central Excise CST, VAT & Sales Tax Wealth tax Indian Laws
Court	-- Any -- Supreme Court SC Orders / Highlights High Court Appellate Tribunal Tribunal Appellate authority for Advance Ruling Advance Ruling Authority National Financial Reporting Authority Competition Commission of India ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY Commission Central Government Board DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court Commissioner / Appellate Authority Other
Citation	--Year-- 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 Upto 1949 - -Volume- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 -
Landmark	Nil - N/A Referred in >= 2 Cases Referred in >= 4 Cases Referred in >= 5 Cases Referred in >= 10 Cases Referred in >= 15 Cases Referred in >= 25 Cases Referred in >= 50 Cases Referred in >= 100 Cases
Order by	TMI Citation Date of Decision

Advanced Search Options

Case Laws

Showing 61 to 64 of 64 Records

• 1969 (1) TMI 4
  

  Assessee, an agent procuring paddy, paid levy, penalty for supply of paddy not conforming to quality requirements - Whether, the amount paid by the assessee by way of penalty to the Government of Orissa was an admissible deduction u/s 10(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 - Held yes

  ---

• 1969 (1) TMI 3
  

  Business of manufacture and sale of sugar and supply of electricity - an order for recovery was made under section 46(7) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 - argument that the movables were of no use to any person other than the purchaser of immovable property is without substance - sale of immovable property can not be resorted to only after adopting other methods - assessee's appeal is dismissed

  ---

• 1969 (1) TMI 2
  
  The Supreme Court held that an order passed under section 23A of the Income-tax Act, 1922, directing payment of additional supertax is not an order of assessment. The period of limitation under section 34(3) does not apply to such orders. The appeal was allowed, and the order passed by the High Court was set aside. The appellant was entitled to costs.

  ---

• 1969 (1) TMI 1
  

  Assessee took on lease premises for a term of 99 years on a monthly rental - receipt of Rs.55,200 by the assessee was capital receipt because receipt was having all the character of capital payment being paid as premium or salami - Assessee's appeal allowed

  ---

1234