|
Advanced Search Options
Case Laws
Showing 61 to 67 of 67 Records
-
1970 (10) TMI 7
Issues:
Calculation of penalty for a registered firm under section 271(1) read with section 271(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 based on advance tax paid by partners.
Detailed Analysis:
Issue 1: Calculation of Penalty for a Registered Firm
The judgment addresses the question of whether, for calculating the penalty on a registered firm under section 271(1) and 271(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the advance tax paid by partners should be deducted from the gross tax payable by the firm as if it were an unregistered firm. The court examines the legislative provisions and the application of the fiction created by section 271(2) which treats a registered firm as unregistered for penalty calculation purposes.
Analysis:
The court emphasizes that the penalty amount is based on the tax payable by the assessee. In the case of a registered firm, the tax liability is determined as if it were unregistered, necessitating the consideration of the total income of the firm. The judgment clarifies that advance tax paid by partners individually cannot be deducted from the tax liability of the firm for penalty calculation. The court rejects the contention that partners' advance tax should be considered as a payment by the firm, highlighting the separate legal entities of the firm and partners for tax purposes.
Issue 2: Interpretation of Legislative Provisions
The judgment delves into the interpretation of section 271(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which directs that a registered firm be treated as unregistered for penalty computation. The court analyzes the statutory fiction created by this provision and the limits to extending such fictions beyond the language of the statute.
Analysis:
The court explains that while the statutory fiction requires treating a registered firm as unregistered for penalty assessment, it does not extend to considering partners' advance tax as payment by the firm. The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to the language of the law and not creating additional fictions beyond the statutory framework. It also highlights that considerations of equity do not typically apply in tax law interpretation, suggesting that individual hardships can be addressed through discretionary powers of tax authorities.
Conclusion:
The judgment resolves the issue by ruling in favor of the department, determining that the tax payable by a registered firm for penalty calculation should not include deductions for advance tax paid by partners. It underscores the legal distinction between the firm and its partners, emphasizing the application of statutory fictions within the confines of the law.
-
1970 (10) TMI 6
Issues:
Interpretation of "charitable purpose" under section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment years 1962-63, 1963-64, and 1964-65.
Detailed Analysis:
The case involved the Indian Chamber of Commerce, Cochin, registered under the Cochin Companies Act, 1120, seeking exemption under section 11(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the income derived from issuing weighment certificates and conducting surveys for export goods. The Income-tax Officer initially denied the exemption, stating that the purpose of the association did not qualify as a "charitable purpose" under section 2(15) of the Act. The Tribunal, however, allowed the exemption, considering the association's purpose as charitable. The central question was whether the income could be considered as derived from property held on trust wholly for a charitable purpose.
The definition of "charitable purpose" under section 2(15) of the Act includes relief of the poor, education, medical relief, and the advancement of any other object of general public utility not involving profit-oriented activities. The association's objects, as outlined in its memorandum, focused on promoting trade, commerce, and unity among commercial entities, along with arbitrating in commercial disputes. The Court analyzed these objects in light of previous decisions and held that they fell within the definition of charitable purposes, emphasizing that the objects were for general public utility.
The association's activities of issuing certificates and conducting surveys were challenged as profit-seeking activities, potentially disqualifying the purpose as charitable. However, the Court rejected this argument, stating that the mere existence of profit from activities conducted in furtherance of charitable objects does not negate the charitable nature of the purpose. The Court clarified that for an activity to disqualify as charitable, it must involve carrying on an activity primarily for profit, which was not the case here. The Court highlighted that the excess income over expenditure, even if resulting from activities like issuing certificates, did not render the purpose non-charitable under section 11(1)(a) of the Act.
In conclusion, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the income derived from the association's activities qualified for exemption under section 11(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The judgment directed the parties to bear their respective costs, and a copy of the judgment was to be sent to the Appellate Tribunal as per statutory requirements under the Act.
-
1970 (10) TMI 5
Search - goods in the custody of Central Excise Authorities - proper procedure for the Income-tax Authorities is to proceed under ss. 69, 69A and 69B of the IT Act - order under sub-section (3) of section 132 freezing the silver was clearly unauthorised, so it is quashed
-
1970 (10) TMI 4
Whether the Income-tax Officer initiated the proceedings by serving the notice under section 34(1)(a) on one Daulatram, believing Daulatram to be the sole legal representative of Chooharmal Wadhuramn, who was the original assessee - validity of proceedings
-
1970 (10) TMI 3
Development rebate - Whether the Income-tax Officer was entitled to withdraw the development rebate granted on the cheese dyeing plant by holding that the grant of the allowance originally was a mistake apparent from the record which could be rectified
-
1970 (10) TMI 2
Assessee is a limited liability company doing rubber plantation business; and the assessee took on lease forest land - it gave contracts to truck and remove trees for clearing the area for planting rubber - whether the amounts representing the sale proceeds of timber cut and removed with roots constitute revenue receipts in the hands of the assessee and are taxable as such under the Income-tax Act, 1961
-
1970 (10) TMI 1
Winding-up of the company in liquidation - direction was issued to the liquidator to prepare and file returns before the Income-tax Officer with respect to the income derived in the course of the winding-up - held that any receipt in the course of the winding-up would attract liability to income-tax - and liquidator, on an order of winding-up being made, become a "principal officer" of the company within the meaning of section 2(35)(a) - so liquidator has to file the returns
|
9911796707
