9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Appeal by Revenue and cross objection by assessee against Order passed by CIT(A) for assessment year 2007-08.
Issue 1 - Grounds raised by Revenue: The Revenue contested the direction to reduce eligible amount u/s 115JB by Rs. 78 lakh, specifically regarding ITDS Certificate Receivable, Earnest Money Deposit, and Software Expenses. The CIT(A) deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal held that the AO cannot increase profit or loss under section 115JB beyond what is specified in Explanation 1. Therefore, the Tribunal found no illegality in the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition. Issue 2 - Disallowance of unabsorbed depreciation: The Revenue disallowed the claim of unabsorbed depreciation amounting to Rs. 16,59,64,100 while computing eligible book profit u/s 115JB. The CIT(A) allowed the claim, considering the lower of the loss and unabsorbed depreciation. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. Issue 3 - Assessee's appeal - TDS certificate amount: The assessee wrote off Rs. 12.19 lakhs due from a client as prior period expenses. The Assessing Officer disallowed this amount, which the CIT(A) upheld. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A), stating that the expense did not relate to the current year as per accounting standards, thus sustaining the disallowance. Issue 4 - Disallowance of earnest money deposits: The assessee wrote off Rs. 40.62 lakhs deposited with a client as prior period expenses. The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance, considering it as expenditure from an earlier year. The Tribunal disagreed, stating that the earnest money deposit did not represent current expenditure but a failed recovery from a previous year, allowing the claim. Issue 5 - Disallowance of software expenses: The Revenue disallowed Rs. 25.19 lakhs incurred for acquiring readymade software, treating it as capital expenditure. The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance but directed depreciation allowance. The Tribunal, after considering the nature of the expenses for software upgradation, allowed the claim as a revenue expenditure, overturning the CIT(A)'s decision. Issue 6 - TDS credit discrepancy: The assessee claimed TDS of Rs. 10,14,579, but the AO allowed credit for Rs. 6,39,801. The CIT(A) held the ground not maintainable under section 246A. The Tribunal disagreed with the CIT(A) and directed the AO to verify the TDS certificate and allow credit accordingly. In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and partially allowed the assessee's appeal, pronouncing the order on 7th May, 2013.
|
