Home
Issues involved: Appeal against imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1996-97.
Assessment of Business Income: - The assessee filed a return of income at &8377; 2,44,550, but assessment was framed at an income of &8377; 13,20,000. - Tribunal reduced the income from business by &8377; 1.30 lakhs but confirmed the addition on account of cash credit. - Hon'ble High Court accepted substantial question of law u/s 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Penalty Proceedings: - Assessing Officer levied penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act, which was confirmed by CIT(A). - Assessee contended that penalty should not be levied as it can substantiate no concealment of income. - Assessee produced cash creditors who confirmed advancing of loan by account payee cheque. - Legal arguments presented citing relevant case laws to support the contention against penalty imposition. - Ld. Sr. DR supported penalty imposition based on Tribunal's confirmation of addition made by Assessing Officer. Tribunal's Decision: - Tribunal confirmed reduction of business income but upheld addition on cash credit. - Hon'ble High Court admitted substantial question of law regarding the cash credit addition. - Decision of Coordinate Bench and other High Courts cited to support the assessee's position. - Tribunal did not find justification for penalty imposition where substantial question of law was accepted. - Penalty confirmed for the addition in business income as no substantial question of law was accepted. Conclusion: - Penalty upheld for the addition in business income but not for the cash credit addition. - Appeal of the assessee partly allowed based on the Tribunal's decision. - The order was pronounced on 29th January, 2013.
|