Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2013 (5) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2013 (5) TMI 951 - DELHI HIGH COURTDishonor of Cheque - Vicarious liability - not involve in day to day conduct of the business - Quashing the summon orders passed by Metropolitan Magistrate in the complaint u/s 138 r/w sec. 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the Company Secretary of the accused Company - HELD THAT:- The prime objective of this Court is to remind all the Metropolitan Magistrates in Delhi to carefully scrutinize all the complaint cases being filed under Section 138 r/w 141 of the Act, against the accused companies at the pre-summoning stage and make sure that notice be directed only to those directors or employees of the company who satisfy the principles laid down in the aforesaid judgments. Summons must be issued only after giving due consideration to the allegations and the materials placed on record by the complainant. Undeniably, as per the aforesaid legal pronouncements, Managing Director and the Joint Managing Director are deemed to be vicariously liable for the offence committed by the company because of the position they hold in the company. Problem arises in cases where all the persons holding office in the company are sought to be prosecuted by the complainant, irrespective of whether they played any specific role in the incriminating act. One can also not lose sight of the fact that once such innocent persons are summoned, they have no choice but to seek bail and face the ordeal of trial. Many of such persons also approach the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to seek quashing of the summoning order and the complaint filed against them and this further increases the burden on the already overburdened Courts. Therefore, With a view to ensure that the Metropolitan Magistrates dealing with the complaint cases filed under Section 138 r/w Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act have a clear and complete picture of the persons arrayed by the complainant so as to hold them vicariously liable for the commission of the offence by the accused company, court is inclined to direct that the Magistrates must seek copies of Form-32 from the complainant to prima facie satisfy the Court as to who were the directors of the accused company at the time of commission of the alleged offence and on the date of filing of the complaint case. In addition to the above, the Magistrates must also seek information as given which is to be annexed by the Complainant on a separate sheet accompanying the complaint. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to all the Metropolitan Magistrates posted in various district courts of Delhi for necessary compliance. Registry is further directed to send a copy of this order to all the Bar Associations of various district courts of Delhi, so that they can apprise the members of the Bar about the aforesaid directions.
|