9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
- Deductibility of interest paid on borrowed money for purchasing securities under section 19(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. - Interpretation of the provisions related to "Interest on securities" and deductions under section 19. - Comparison of wording between section 19 and section 57 for deductions from "Income from other sources." - Consideration of a judgment by the Punjab High Court and a Supreme Court decision in a similar context. - Examination of whether the securities were purchased for investment purposes or other reasons. - Determination of whether the intention behind purchasing the securities affects the deductibility of interest paid on borrowed money. Analysis: The High Court of Calcutta dealt with a reference question regarding the deductibility of interest paid on borrowed money for purchasing securities under section 19(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal had upheld the claim for deduction of interest, which was challenged by the Revenue. The Revenue argued that since the assessee did not have any income chargeable under "Interest on securities," the interest paid should not be allowed as a deduction. They relied on a judgment of the Punjab High Court to support their position. The court analyzed the relevant provisions, highlighting that section 19 allows for the deduction of interest payable on borrowed money for investing in securities. Drawing a parallel with section 57 for deductions from "Income from other sources," the court referred to a Supreme Court decision emphasizing that the deduction of expenditure should not be conditional upon the earning of income. Therefore, the absence of income from interest on securities in a particular year should not disqualify the deduction of interest paid on borrowed money. The Revenue raised a question regarding the purpose of purchasing the securities, suggesting they were not acquired for investment but for other reasons. However, this aspect was not raised before the Tribunal and required factual investigation. The court declined to delve into this question, emphasizing that it involves factual analysis and was not purely a legal issue. The intention behind the purchase of securities could only be determined by the Tribunal based on the available facts. Ultimately, the court answered the reference question in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction of interest paid on borrowed money for purchasing securities. The judgment was delivered unanimously by the judges, with no order as to costs.
|
