Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + HC Income Tax - 1985 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

1985 (10) TMI 91 - HC - Income Tax

Issues involved:
The judgment involves the interpretation of section 64(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, regarding the inclusion of the share income of the assessee's wife and minor children in the assessee's hands based on residential status considerations.

Summary:

The case involved references arising under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for assessment years 1967-68 to 1970-71. The question was whether the share income of the assessee's wife and minor children should be included in the assessee's hands based on residential status considerations under section 64(1) of the Act. The assessee, a partner in a firm in Nigeria, had family members as partners, and their incomes were included in the assessee's total income for taxation purposes.

The Appellate Assistant Commissioner held that the wife and minor sons' income should not be included in the assessee's total income for taxation. The Revenue appealed to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, which also ruled in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal's decision was challenged, leading to the reference to the High Court.

The High Court analyzed the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act, particularly section 64(1) and section 5, to determine the scope of total income and the inclusion of specific incomes. The Court emphasized that the provisions should be interpreted harmoniously and in line with the legislative intent.

The Court rejected the argument that the wife and minor sons' income should be included in the assessee's total income based on section 5, highlighting that such an interpretation would lead to illogical and unjust results. The Court concluded that the wife and minor sons' income should not be included in the assessee's total income, aligning with the language and purpose of the relevant sections.

In conclusion, the Court answered the question in the affirmative and in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the interpretation provided was based on the language and intent of the relevant provisions. The Commissioner was directed to pay the costs of the references.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates