Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + CGOVT Customs - 2018 (1) TMI CGOVT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (1) TMI 1458 - CGOVT - Customs


Issues: Classification of exported goods for duty drawback under the Customs Act.

Detailed Analysis:
1. Facts Leading to Revision Application: The applicant exported women narrow fabric elastics and claimed drawback of duty under S. No. 580601 of Duty Drawback Schedule 2011-12. Customs Officers opined that the goods were mis-declared to avail higher duty drawback. Despite explanations and technical reports submitted by the applicant, a show cause notice was issued disallowing duty drawback and imposing a penalty under the Customs Act. The Deputy Commissioner rejected the applicant's case based on the test report, concluding the goods were classifiable under S. No. 5604 instead of S. No. 5806. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld this decision.

2. Grounds for Revision Application: The applicant filed a revision application before the Central Government seeking to set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order and restore the originally claimed duty drawback. The applicant argued that their product should be classified under S. No. 5806 as narrow woven fabrics, not under 5604 as determined by the lower authorities.

3. Analysis of Lower Authorities' Orders: The Deputy Commissioner and the Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the classification under S. No. 5806 solely based on the presence of both warp and weft in the goods. However, they failed to consider the applicant's explanations and technical literature supporting their classification under S. No. 5806. The orders were found to be flawed as they did not appreciate the facts and submissions made by the applicant.

4. Interpretation of CTH 5806: The applicant argued that CTH 5806 has two parts separated by a semi-colon, and their product falls under the first part as narrow woven fabrics. By analyzing technical literature and legal precedents, the Government agreed with the applicant's interpretation. The description of CTH 5806 covers both narrow woven fabrics and fabrics consisting of warp without weft. The applicant's product, being narrow woven elastics, satisfied the criteria for classification under S. No. 5806.

5. Conclusion and Decision: The Government set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order, allowing the revision application. It was determined that the applicant's product should be classified under S. No. 5806 for duty drawback purposes, as originally claimed by the applicant. The lower authorities' failure to consider all relevant aspects led to the erroneous classification of the goods under S. No. 5604.

In summary, the judgment focused on the correct classification of the exported goods for duty drawback, highlighting the importance of considering all relevant factors and submissions by the applicant in such cases under the Customs Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates