Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + SC Companies Law - 2020 (1) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2020 (1) TMI 1504 - SC - Companies LawEntitlement to provident fund benefits - contractual employees of the Appellant-Company - statutory obligation to provide the benefit of provident fund - entitled to provident fund benefits under the Pawan Hans Employees Provident Fund Trust Regulations or under the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (EPF Act) and the Employees’ Provident Fund Scheme, 1952 (EPF Scheme) framed thereunder? HELD THAT:- This Court in Regional Provident Fund Commissioner v. Sanatan Dharam Girls Secondary School [2006 (10) TMI 509 - SUPREME COURT] laid down a twin test for an establishment to seek exemption from the provisions of the EPF Act, 1952. The twin conditions are: First, the establishment must be either “belonging to” or “under the control of” the Central or the State Government. The phrase “belonging to” would signify “ownership” of the Government, whereas the phrase “under the control of” would imply superintendence, management or authority to direct, restrict or regulate and Second, the employees of such an establishment should be entitled to the benefit of contributory provident fund or old age pension in accordance with any scheme or rule framed by the Central Government or the State Government governing such benefits - If both tests are satisfied, an establishment can claim exemption/exclusion under Section 16(1)(b) of the EPF Act. Applying the first test to the instant case, the Central Government has a 51% ownership in the AppellantCompany, while the balance 49% is owned by the ONGC, a Central Government PSU - With respect to the second test, it is relevant to note that the Company had its own Scheme viz. the Pawan Hans Employees Provident Fund Trust Regulations in force. The Company however restricted the application of the PF Trust Regulations to only the ‘regular’ employees. The PF Trust Regulations of the Company were not framed by the Central or State Government, nor were they applicable to all the employees of the Company, so as to satisfy the second test. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Bandra issued letter dated 24.05.2017 addressed to the Company wherein it was stated that the benefit of contributory provident fund was not being provided to contractual/casual employees of the Company; and was directed to implement the provisions of the EPF Act. The Company does not satisfy the second test, since the members of the Respondent Union and other similarly situated contractual workers were not getting the benefits of contributory provident fund under the PF Trust Regulations framed by the Company, or under any Scheme or any rule framed by the Central Government or the State Government. Consequentially, the exemption under Section 16 of EPF Act would not be applicable to the Appellant-Company - the Company has failed to make out a case of exclusion from the applicability of the provisions of the EPF Act. Whether the members of the Respondent-Trade Union are entitled to the benefit of Provident Fund under the PF Trust Regulations or under the EPF Act? - HELD THAT:- The members of the Respondent Union have been in continuous employment with the Company for long periods of time. They have been receiving wages/salary directly from the Company without the involvement of any contractor since the date of their engagement - the members of the Respondent Union and all other similarly situated contractual employees, are entitled to the benefit of provident fund under the PF Trust Regulations or the EPF Act. Since the PF Trust Regulations are in force and are applicable to all employees of the Company, it would be preferable to direct that the members of the Respondent Union and other similarly situated contractual employees are granted the benefit of provident fund under the PF Trust Regulations so that there is uniformity in the service conditions of all the employees of the Company. Date from which the benefit of provident fund is to be extended to the contractual employees - HELD THAT:- The Judgment & Order dated 12.09.2018 passed by the Bombay High Court in W.P.No.325/2017 holding that members of the Respondent Union are covered by the EPF Act is affirmed - However, the direction of the High Court to grant the benefits under the EPF Act is modified, and the members of the Respondent Union and other similarly situated contractual employees are directed to be enrolled under the Pawan Hans Employees Provident Fund Trust Regulations so that there is uniformity in the conditions of service of all employees of the Appellant-Company. The interests of justice would be best subserved if the benefit of Provident Fund is provided to the members of the Respondent-Union, and other similarly situated contractual employees, from January 2017 when the Writ Petition was filed before the High Court - appeal disposed off.
|