2009 (7) TMI 6 - SUPREME COURT

Revision in price – supplementary invoice - payment of duty on differential amount - The assessee gave its reply stating that the payment of differential duty was made by it at the time of issuing supplementary invoices to the customers and, therefore, there was no question of charging interest much less any penalty - It is to be noted that the assessee was able to demand from its customers the balance of the higher prices by virtue of retrospective revision of the prices. It, therefore, follows that at the time of sale the goods carried a higher value and those were cleared on short payment of duty. The differential duty was paid only later when the assessee issued supplementary invoices to its customers demanding the balance amounts. Seen thus it was clearly a case of short payment of duty though indeed completely unintended and without any element of deceit etc. The payment of differential duty thus clearly came under sub-section (2B) of section 11A and attracted levy of interest under section 11AB of the Act.