9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Reopening of assessment under the Income Tax Act based on confessional statements. 2. Validity of confessional statements in relation to the loans on khata peta accounts. Analysis: The judgment involves an appeal against the dismissal of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution regarding the reopening of assessments for the assessment years 1953-54 and 1954-55 under the Income Tax Act. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) issued notices under section 148 of the Act, alleging that income had escaped assessment due to the appellant's failure to disclose all relevant particulars. The appellant contended that all primary facts were disclosed before the original assessments were completed. The ITO reopened the assessments based on a confession by Dwarka Prosad, alleging name-lending business without advancing money in certain accounts. However, Dwarka Prosad's confession did not mention the appellant or the loans on the khata peta accounts in question. The confession of Dwarka Prosad's son also implicated the transactions as bogus, but the ITO's case was primarily based on Dwarka Prosad's confession. The court emphasized the importance of a direct nexus between the material and the belief for reopening assessments, citing a Supreme Court ruling. The court found that the confessions did not establish a link to the loans in question, thus failing to meet the preconditions for reopening assessments under the Act. Consequently, the court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgment, restoring the rule nisi, and quashing the impugned notices and proceedings. Regarding the questions raised by the revenue, the court rejected the application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court, as they had already considered the confessional statements and ruled in favor of the appellant. The stay on the operation of the judgment was granted for six weeks as requested by the revenue. Both judges, R. N. Pyne and S. C. Deb, concurred with the decision. The judgment highlighted the necessity of a strong connection between the material prompting the belief of income escapement and the actual circumstances, emphasizing the importance of good faith in such assessments under the Income Tax Act.
|
