1982 (3) TMI 64 - HC - Customs

Landing charges are includible in assessable value - Import into India and export from India - Custom Duty - Taxable event - Words and Phrases - Canons of interpretation

Issues Involved:
1. Inclusion of landing charges in the assessable value for customs duty computation.
2. Determination of the point of importation for customs duty purposes.
3. Legality of refund claims for customs duty paid on landing charges.

Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Inclusion of Landing Charges in Assessable Value for Customs Duty Computation:
The core issue revolves around whether landing charges should be included in the assessable value of imported goods for customs duty purposes. The petitioners argued that landing charges, being post-importation expenses, should not be included in the assessable value. They contended that the taxable event occurs when the goods enter Indian territorial waters, thus excluding landing charges from the assessable value.

The court rejected this argument, stating that customs duty is levied on goods imported into India, which refers to the Indian landmass and not just the territorial waters. The court emphasized that the valuation of goods should be made at the point of time when the goods are landed on the landmass of India, not when they are still on the ship or suspended in the air during unloading. The court cited Section 14 of the Customs Act, which mandates that the value of goods be determined based on the price at the time and place of importation, which is when the goods are unloaded on the landmass of India. Therefore, the inclusion of landing charges in the assessable value is lawful and aligns with the longstanding practice.

2. Determination of the Point of Importation for Customs Duty Purposes:
The petitioners contended that importation occurs when goods enter Indian territorial waters, thus the valuation should be based on the price at that point. However, the court clarified that importation into India means importation into the Indian landmass, not just the territorial waters. The court explained that the expression "imported into or exported from India" in Section 12 of the Customs Act must be interpreted consistently to mean the landmass of India. This interpretation avoids absurd results, such as customs duty being payable even if a ship merely strays into territorial waters without unloading goods. The court concluded that the taxable event and valuation must occur when the goods are landed on the landmass of India.

3. Legality of Refund Claims for Customs Duty Paid on Landing Charges:
The petitioners sought a refund of customs duty paid on landing charges, arguing that the payments were made under a mistake of law. The court acknowledged the significant implications of such a refund, including potential claims from numerous importers and the resulting financial impact on the government and consumers. The court emphasized that the practice of including landing charges in the assessable value has been accepted for over 40 years, and unsettling this practice would lead to numerous complications and unjust enrichment of importers at the expense of consumers.

The court cited precedents and emphasized the need for a pragmatic and commonsense approach, highlighting that the interpretation of customs laws should not lead to unreasonable or absurd outcomes. The court concluded that the inclusion of landing charges in the assessable value is lawful and that the petitioners' claims for refunds are not justified.

Conclusion:
The court dismissed the petitions, upholding the inclusion of landing charges in the assessable value for customs duty computation. The court emphasized that the point of importation is when goods are landed on the landmass of India, and the longstanding practice of including landing charges in the assessable value is lawful. The court also refused to grant a certificate of fitness for appeal to the Supreme Court, stating that the issue does not involve a substantial question of law of general importance.

← Previous Next →