9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Refusal to refund certain amount - Assessment year 1978-79 - Appeal against order under s. 237 - Competency of appeal under s. 246(1)(n) - Interpretation of provisions regarding refund and interest - Correctness of refund amount - Entitlement to additional refund amount - Appeal dismissal by AAC - Refund order under s. 237 - Applicability of interest on excess tax - Competency of appeal before AAC. Analysis: The case involved an appeal by the assessee against the refusal to refund a certain amount for the assessment year 1978-79. The assessee contended that the total refund due was Rs. 3,288, including excess advance tax, interest under s. 214(1), and interest under s. 214(2), resulting in a shortfall of Rs. 713 in the refund granted. The AAC dismissed the appeal, stating it was not maintainable under s. 237. The issue revolved around the competency of the appeal under s. 246(1)(n) concerning orders under s. 237 of the IT Act. The assessee argued that the excess advance tax paid entitled them to a refund under s. 237, including interest amounts. The Departmental Representative contended that s. 237 only pertained to the refund of excess tax, not interest. However, the Tribunal reasoned that interest on excess tax should also fall under s. 237, as interest due would be part of the tax itself. Denying the appeal on the basis of interest not being covered under s. 237 would lead to an inconvenient and anomalous situation for assessees. The Tribunal cited a judgment supporting the view that all refund orders are under s. 237, even if interest amounts are excluded. In the present case, the excess tax was Rs. 2,188, and the granted refund was Rs. 2,575, indicating a deficiency possibly due to interest. Therefore, the appeal was deemed competent, and the AAC's dismissal was found incorrect. As the calculation of the additional refund amount of Rs. 713 was unchallenged, the Tribunal saw no need to remand the matter for further review. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, setting aside the AAC's order, and directing the ITO to grant the additional refund promptly. In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the assessee's appeal, emphasizing the applicability of interest on excess tax under s. 237 and the competency of the appeal before the AAC. The decision highlighted the importance of interpreting provisions harmoniously to ensure the rightful refund of excess tax amounts to assessees.
|
