Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1987 (12) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1987 (12) TMI 212 - CEGAT, BOMBAYExtract: .......e appellants. It was urged in the revision application that what was removed was not toluene but distilled toluene. Therefore, there is no violation of Rule 196. There is no merit in this contention. Just because the toluene had undergone certain processes it does not cease to be toluene. 7. In the result this appeal fails and the same is rejected.
|