9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2025 (5) TMI 624 - HC - Income TaxValidity of Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - period of limitation - notice issued in accordance with the statutory regime as existed prior to 31.03.2021 - HELD THAT - The notice issued under Section 148 of the Act stands quashed and set aside. Concededly the controversy is covered in favour of the Assessee by the decision of this court in Makemytrip India Pvt. Ltd. 2025 (4) TMI 46 - DELHI HIGH COURT wherein the impugned notice was issued on 27.07.2022 which was admittedly beyond the period of limitation as prescribed under Section 149 (1). Since TOLA was not applicable in respect of the said notices u/s 148 of the Act for AY 2015-16 as conceded by the Revenue in the case of Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal 2024 (10) TMI 264 - SUPREME COURT (LB) thus the impugned notice is liable to be set aside.
1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED
- Whether the notice dated 30.08.2022 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reopening the assessment year 2015-16 is valid and sustainable in law. - Whether the reassessment proceedings initiated pursuant to the impugned notice comply with the procedural requirements introduced by the Finance Act, 2021, and the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 [TOLA]. - Whether the reopening notice issued after 01.04.2021 but following the pre-31.03.2021 regime of reassessment is liable to be quashed. - The applicability and effect of the Supreme Court's decision in Union of India & Ors. v. Ashish Agarwal and Union of India & Ors. v. Rajeev Bansal on the reassessment proceedings. - Whether the Assessing Officer (AO) possessed any new material or information justifying reopening of the assessment for AY 2015-16. 2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS Validity of the Notice Issued under Section 148 for AY 2015-16 The legal framework governing reassessment notices underwent significant changes with the Finance Act, 2021, which substituted the old reassessment regime with a new procedural regime, including the introduction of Section 148A. Prior to 31.03.2021, notices under Section 148 could be issued without the procedural safeguards now mandated. The petitioner challenged the notice dated 30.08.2022 on the ground that it was issued under the old regime post 31.03.2021 and hence was unsustainable. The Court examined the procedural history and noted that the AO had initially completed the assessment for AY 2015-16 on 09.10.2017, after scrutiny proceedings. Subsequent notices issued in 2021 sought to verify certain bank account transactions, to which the Assessee responded that all such transactions were duly reflected in the books of accounts and that the AO had already allowed exemption under Section 13A. Precedents including the decision of this Court in Mon Mohan Kohli v. Assistant Commissioner of Income and Anr. were considered, where notices issued after 31.03.2021 without following Section 148A were set aside. Various High Courts had expressed similar views, emphasizing adherence to the new procedural safeguards. The Court further noted that the Supreme Court in Union of India & Ors. v. Ashish Agarwal had directed that notices issued between 01.04.2021 and 30.06.2021 under the old regime be treated as notices under Section 148A(b), granting time to the AO to furnish material justifying reassessment. Applicability of TOLA and Concession by Revenue Regarding Limitation The Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA) extended limitation periods for issuance of reassessment notices due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Court scrutinized the interplay between TOLA and the new reassessment regime, particularly Section 149 of the Income Tax Act. The Supreme Court's decision in Union of India & Ors. v. Rajeev Bansal was pivotal. The Court reproduced paragraphs 19(e) and 19(f) wherein the Revenue conceded that for AY 2015-16, all notices issued on or after 01.04.2021 must be dropped as they do not fall within the extended limitation period prescribed under TOLA. The Court analyzed the tabulation provided by the Supreme Court, which clarified that for AY 2015-16, the limitation for reassessment under the old regime expired on 31.03.2022 and TOLA was not applicable to extend this period beyond that date. Since the impugned notice was issued on 30.08.2022, it was beyond the permissible period. Whether AO Possessed Any New Material Justifying Reopening The Assessee contended that the AO did not have any new material or information suggesting escapement of income beyond what was already examined during the original assessment. The deposits in the two bank accounts were from donations and coupon receipts, which were fully disclosed and scrutinized. The AO had allowed a deduction of over Rs. 67 crores under Section 13A after due verification. The Court observed that the AO's notices seeking verification of bank transactions were responded to by the Assessee with full disclosure and explanations. The AO's subsequent issuance of the reassessment notice without any fresh material was therefore not justified. Treatment of Competing Arguments and Precedents The Revenue's position was undermined by its own concession before the Supreme Court in Rajeev Bansal and the directions in Ashish Agarwal. The Court also relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Deepak Steel and Power Ltd. v. Central Board of Direct Taxes, where the concession was reiterated and notices issued post 01.04.2021 for AY 2015-16 were quashed. The Court noted that the controversy was squarely covered in favor of the Assessee by the decision in Makemytrip India Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 16 (1) Delhi & Anr., which held that notices issued beyond the limitation period and without compliance with new procedural safeguards are liable to be set aside. 3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS "The Revenue concedes that for the assessment year 2015-16, all notices issued on or after 1 April 2021 will have to be dropped as they will not fall for completion during the period prescribed under the Taxation and other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020." (Union of India & Ors. v. Rajeev Bansal, para 19(f)) "The notice dated 30.08.2022 issued under Section 148 of the Act stands quashed and set aside." Core principles established include:
Final determinations:
|
