Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1999 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1999 (3) TMI 344 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......tion should be such as to indicate that the manufacturer has a proprietary interest in the medicine. rdquo 5. emsp In these facts and circumstances and following the ratio of the above referred case, we hold that the medicine in question is not a patent or proprietary medicine and accordingly we set aside both the orders and allow both the appeals.
|