Digital Age Tax Enforcement: Understanding the Implications of Clause 247 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 vs. Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Clause 247 Search and seizure. - Income Tax Bill, 2025

Clause 247 Search and seizure. Income Tax Bill, 2025 Introduction In the rapidly evolving landscape of digital information and financial transactions, the power of tax authorities to conduct searches and seizures has become a critical tool for enforcing compliance and uncovering undisclosed income. Clause 247 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 , introduces significant changes in the scope of these powers, particularly concerning the ability of tax officials to access electronic media, including emails, social media, trading, and bank accounts. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of Clause 247 , comparing it with the existing powers u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 , and discusses the potential implications and concerns surrounding these provisions. Objective and Purpose The primary objective of Clause 247 is to enhance the ability of tax authorities to detect and prevent tax evasion by expanding their powers to include digital and electronic records. This expansion reflects the increasing prevalence of digital transactions and the need for tax authorities to adapt to modern methods of financial management. The clause aims to provide a robust framework for the search and seizure of electronic data, ensuring that tax officials can access relevant information stored in various digital formats. Detailed Analysis Key Provisions of Clause 247 Clause 247 outlines the conditions under which tax authorities can conduct searches and seizures. It grants the competent authority the power to authorize searches based on information suggesting that a person has failed to produce required documents or possesses undisclosed assets. The clause specifies that authorized officers can enter and search premises, access electronic records, and seize relevant documents and assets. Electronic Media and Digital Records A significant aspect of Clause 247 is its focus on electronic media and digital records. Authorized officers can demand access to electronic records, including emails and social media accounts, if they believe such information is relevant to tax proceedings. This provision raises concerns about privacy and the potential for misuse, as it grants tax officials broad access to personal and sensitive information. Comparison with Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 , provides similar powers for search and seizure but lacks specific provisions for electronic media. The 1961 Act primarily focuses on physical documents and assets, reflecting the technological landscape of its time. Clause 247 of the 2025 Bill modernizes these powers by explicitly including digital records, aligning with contemporary financial practices. Practical Implications The expanded powers under Clause 247 have significant implications for individuals and businesses. The ability to access digital records means that tax authorities can more effectively trace financial transactions and uncover hidden income. However, this also raises concerns about privacy and the potential for abuse. Businesses and individuals must ensure compliance with tax regulations and maintain accurate records to avoid scrutiny. Comparative Analysis Internationally, various jurisdictions have implemented similar provisions to address the challenges posed by digital transactions. For instance, the United States and the European Union have specific regulations governing the access of electronic records by tax authorities. These regulations often include safeguards to protect privacy and prevent misuse, which could serve as models for refining Clause 247 . Conclusion Clause 247 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 , represents a significant shift in the powers of tax authorities, reflecting the need to adapt to the digital age. While these powers are essential for combating tax evasion, they must be balanced with safeguards to protect individual privacy and prevent misuse. As the Bill progresses through legislative processes, stakeholders should consider potential reforms to ensure that these powers are exercised responsibly and transparently. Full Text : Clause 247 Search and seizure.