TMI Short Notes | |||||||||||||||
Legislative framework governing the taxation of income derived by non-residents from bonds and Global Depository Receipt : Clause 209 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 115AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 |
|||||||||||||||
Submit your Comments
IntroductionClause 209 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 represents a significant evolution in the Indian legislative framework governing the taxation of income derived by non-residents from bonds and Global Depository Receipts (GDRs) purchased in foreign currency, as well as capital gains arising from their transfer. This provision is the legislative successor to Section 115AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which, together with a series of government notifications, has historically regulated the tax treatment of such instruments. The present commentary provides a comprehensive and detailed analysis of Clause 209, juxtaposing it with the extant Section 115AC, and critically examines the interplay with key notifications, namely S.O.1032(E) dated 24-12-1993, Notification No. 28/2008 dated 21-02-2008, and Notification No. 243/2002 dated 10-09-2002. This analysis is undertaken in the context of India's broader policy objectives of attracting foreign capital, ensuring tax certainty, and aligning domestic law with international financial practices. Objective and PurposeThe legislative intent behind Clause 209, much like its predecessor Section 115AC, is to provide a special, concessional tax regime for non-residents investing in specified Indian financial instruments-namely, bonds and GDRs-purchased in foreign currency. The rationale is twofold:
The historical background includes the liberalization of the Indian economy in the early 1990s, which necessitated the creation of transparent, investor-friendly tax provisions for cross-border capital flows, culminating in the enactment of Section 115AC and subsequent notifications. Detailed Analysis of Clause 209 of the Income Tax Bill, 20251. Structure and ScopeClause 209 is structured to specify the tax rates applicable to different types of income accruing to non-residents from specified securities. The provision is comprehensive, covering:
The provision is operative only where the securities are purchased in foreign currency and, for GDRs, through an "approved intermediary" as per a government-notified scheme. 2. Tax Rates and Income CategoriesThe Clause prescribes the following rates:
This clear demarcation of tax rates provides certainty to investors and aligns with the concessional treatment traditionally accorded to non-residents in respect of such instruments. 3. Deductions and Gross Total Income AdjustmentsClause 209(2) echoes the principle that where the gross total income of a non-resident consists only of the specified interest or dividend income, no deductions are allowed u/ss 26 to 61, section 93(1)(a) or 93(1)(e), or under Chapter VIII. Where the gross total income includes both specified and other income, the specified income is excluded for the purposes of computing deductions under Chapter VIII, which are then allowed on the balance. 4. Computation of Capital GainsThe Clause 209(3) provides that the provisions of section 72(6) (presumably dealing with set off of losses) shall not apply for computation of long-term capital gains from the transfer of the specified securities. This ring-fences such gains from set-off, ensuring the concessional rate is applied to the entirety of the gain. 5. Exemption from Filing ReturnClause 209(4) provides that a non-resident is exempt from filing a tax return if their total income consists solely of the specified interest and dividend income, and tax has been deducted at source as per Chapter XIX-B. This eases compliance for passive investors and aligns with international best practices. 6. Amalgamation/Demerger ProvisionsWhere securities are acquired in an amalgamated or resulting company by virtue of holding in the amalgamating or demerged company, the concessional regime continues to apply, ensuring continuity of tax treatment in corporate restructurings. 7. DefinitionsThe Clause defines "approved intermediary" and references the meaning of "Global Depository Receipts" as assigned in section 190(4)(a), ensuring consistency across the legislative framework. Comparative Analysis with Section 115AC of the Income-tax Act, 19611. Structural Parity and Legislative ContinuityClause 209 largely mirrors the structure of Section 115AC, reaffirming the intent to maintain continuity in the concessional tax regime for non-resident investors. Both provisions:
This structural parity demonstrates the legislature's commitment to stability and predictability in the taxation of cross-border investment. 2. Key Differences and Updates
3. Notifications: Scope and Legal Significance
4. Ambiguities and Issues in Interpretation
Practical Implications1. For Non-Resident InvestorsClause 209, like Section 115AC, provides non-resident investors with a predictable, concessional tax regime for specified investments in Indian bonds and GDRs. The exemption from return filing, provided TDS is deducted, significantly reduces compliance burdens for passive investors. The clear specification of eligible instruments and intermediaries, subject to government notification, provides regulatory clarity, though the need for updated notifications remains. 2. For Indian Companies and Public Sector UndertakingsThe provision incentivizes Indian issuers-both private and public sector-to raise capital from global markets by making their securities more attractive to non-resident investors. The certainty of tax treatment is a key selling point in international capital raising. 3. For IntermediariesOnly "approved intermediaries" as notified by the government are permitted to facilitate the purchase of GDRs. This ensures regulatory oversight but may limit competition or innovation in the financial sector unless the list of approved intermediaries is periodically updated. 4. For Tax AdministrationThe provision simplifies administration by ring-fencing specified income and exempting passive investors from return filing, provided TDS compliance is ensured. However, the continued applicability and updating of notifications, as well as the interpretation of new computational provisions, will require careful administrative guidance. ConclusionClause 209 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 represents a careful balance between providing tax incentives to attract foreign capital and ensuring regulatory oversight through the notification mechanism. The provision largely continues the policy framework established by Section 115AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, with some technical updates and a modest increase in the capital gains tax rate, reflecting evolving fiscal policy considerations. The continued relevance of the existing notifications ensures a smooth transition for investors and issuers, though timely updating or re-notification may be required to avoid interpretational uncertainties. Going forward, clarity on the computational mechanics for capital gains, the scope of approved intermediaries, and the process for updating eligible schemes will be critical for maintaining the attractiveness and integrity of the regime. Judicial or administrative clarification may be warranted on the interplay between the new and old provisions and the continued applicability of existing notifications. Full Text:
Dated: 1-5-2025 Submit your Comments
|
|||||||||||||||