Transitioning NRI Taxation : Clause 214 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 115E of Income Tax Act, 1961 Clause 214 Tax on investment income and long-term capital gains. - Income Tax Bill, 2025

Clause 214 Tax on investment income and long-term capital gains. Income Tax Bill, 2025 Introduction The taxation of investment income and long-term capital gains earned by non-resident Indians (NRIs) has been a significant aspect of Indian tax law, reflecting the country s policy towards attracting foreign investment while ensuring tax compliance by its diaspora. Clause 214 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 introduces new special provisions for the taxation of such income, aiming to update or replace the existing regime set out under section 115E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 . This commentary undertakes a comprehensive analysis of Clause 214, exploring its structure, objectives, practical implications, and comparing it with the current Section 115E. The analysis will provide clarity on the legislative intent, operational mechanics, and the broader impact on stakeholders, including NRIs and foreign companies. Objective and Purpose Legislative Intent The primary objective behind the enactment of special provisions for NRIs investment income and long-term capital gains has been to provide a simplified, concessional tax regime that encourages overseas Indians to invest in India. Historically, Section 115E was introduced to offer certainty and favorable tax rates to NRIs investing in specified assets, thereby channeling foreign capital into the Indian economy. Clause 214 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 appears to continue this legislative intent, albeit with certain modifications in rates and structure. The clause is designed to: Streamline the taxation of income from investments and long-term capital gains for non-resident Indians and foreign companies. Maintain a competitive tax regime to attract foreign investment. Align the tax rates and provisions with current economic realities and policy objectives. Policy Considerations and Historical Background The special regime for NRIs was first introduced in the 1980s, motivated by the need to mobilize foreign exchange and strengthen India s external accounts. Over the years, the provisions have undergone amendments to adjust rates and definitions in response to evolving policy priorities and international tax trends. The amendments made by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2024, notably the increase in the rate for long-term capital gains from 10% to 12.5% for transfers after 23 July 2024, reflect an attempt to balance revenue considerations with the need to remain attractive to foreign investors. Detailed Analysis Clause 214 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 Breakdown and Interpretation Clause 214 prescribes the manner of computing income-tax payable by a non-resident Indian whose total income includes: Income from investment or income from long-term capital gains of an asset other than a specified asset (taxed at 20%). Income from long-term capital gains on a specified asset (taxed at 12.5%). Balance total income (taxed as per applicable rates). Key Terms and Their Implications Non-resident Indian: While Clause 214 refers to non-resident Indian, the precise definition is generally to be read in conjunction with definitions provided elsewhere in the Act. This typically refers to an individual who is a citizen of India or a person of Indian origin and is not resident in India. Specified Asset: The clause distinguishes between assets that are specified and those that are not. Although Clause 214 does not itself define specified asset, it is usually defined in related provisions (in Section 115C of the 1961 Act, for example) to mean particular investments such as shares in Indian companies, debentures, deposits, and government securities purchased in convertible foreign exchange. Investment Income: This refers to income (other than capital gains) derived from foreign exchange assets. Long-term Capital Gains: Gains arising from the transfer of a capital asset held for more than a specified period, generally more than 36 months, unless otherwise notified. Structure of Taxation under Clause 214 Income from Investment or Long-term Capital Gains (Other than Specified Asset): Taxed at a flat rate of 20%. This is a concessional rate compared to the standard slab rates applicable to individuals or companies. Long-term Capital Gains on Specified Asset: Taxed at 12.5%. This lower rate is intended to incentivize investment in specified assets, which typically have a positive impact on domestic capital formation. Other Income: The remaining total income, after excluding the above two categories, is taxed at the normal rates applicable to the assessee. Comparison Table (Clause 214) Sl. No. Type of Income Tax Rate 1 Investment income or LTCG (other than specified asset) 20% 2 LTCG on specified asset 12.5% 3 Other income Normal rates Interpretation and Ambiguities Definitions: Both provisions refer to investment income, long-term capital gains, and specified asset, which are terms defined elsewhere in the respective statutes. The precise scope of specified asset is critical, as it determines eligibility for the concessional rate. Any changes in definition between the old and new law would have significant practical implications. Transitional Provisions: Section 115E contains a transitional arrangement for the tax rate on long-term capital gains, which is not explicitly replicated in Clause 214. The new Bill appears to standardize the rate at 12.5%, potentially simplifying compliance but removing the lower rate for earlier transfers. Aggregation Mechanism: Both provisions adopt an aggregation approach-taxing the specified incomes at concessional rates and the balance at normal rates. This avoids the risk of rate shopping and ensures that the concessional regime is ring-fenced. Scope of Application: Both provisions are limited to NRIs and foreign companies, but the Bill s language may clarify or expand the class of eligible taxpayers, depending on its definitions section. Practical Implications For Non-Resident Indians Certainty and Simplicity: The clear tabular presentation in Clause 214, combined with the removal of the transitional rate, provides greater certainty and ease of calculation for NRIs. Investment Decisions: The increase in the concessional rate from 10% to 12.5% for specified asset gains may modestly reduce the post-tax return for NRIs, potentially influencing investment choices, especially in asset classes that previously benefited from the lower rate. Compliance: The aggregation mechanism, retained in both provisions, allows NRIs to segregate their incomes and apply the appropriate rates, reducing the risk of disputes and errors. Transitional Issues: NRIs who entered into transactions prior to the cut-off date u/s 115E may need to carefully assess the applicable rate, particularly if the Bill does not provide grandfathering or transitional relief. For Businesses and Intermediaries Withholding Tax: Indian payers of investment income and capital gains to NRIs must ensure correct withholding, reflecting the applicable rates under the new regime. Reporting and Documentation: The clarity in rate structure aids in accurate reporting and reduces the burden of complex calculations. Potential for Disputes: Any ambiguity in the definition of specified asset or the scope of investment income may give rise to interpretative disputes, especially where new financial instruments or asset classes are involved. For Tax Administration Administrative Efficiency: The standardized rate structure and aggregation mechanism facilitate easier verification and assessment by tax authorities. Policy Alignment: The move to a single rate for long-term capital gains on specified assets reflects a policy choice favoring simplicity over targeted incentives. Compliance and Procedural Aspects Assessees must maintain records to prove the nature and timing of their investments, especially with respect to the cut-off date for LTCG rates u/s 115E. The requirement to determine specified asset status may involve scrutiny of the source of funds and mode of acquisition. The computation of tax liability under these provisions must be done separately for each category of income, necessitating accurate segregation in the return of income. Comparative Analysis: Clause 214 vs. Section 115E 1. Scope and Applicability Section 115E: Applies specifically to non-resident Indians. The definition and eligibility are well-established. Clause 214: The heading refers to non-residents and foreign company, potentially expanding the scope. However, the operative part refers only to non-resident Indian, creating ambiguity. 2. Tax Rates Investment Income LTCG (other than specified asset): Both provisions prescribe a 20% rate. LTCG on Specified Asset: Section 115E: 10% (before 23 July 2024), 12.5% (on or after 23 July 2024). Clause 214: 12.5% (no grandfathering for the old rate). 3. Grandfathering Provisions Section 115E: Explicitly provides for grandfathering, i.e., a lower rate for transfers before a specified date. Clause 214: Does not provide for grandfathering; 12.5% applies uniformly. 4. Treatment of Foreign Companies Section 115E: Does not apply to foreign companies. Clause 214: Heading includes foreign company, but operative part refers to non-resident Indian. This ambiguity may require clarification. 5. Definitions and Cross-References Section 115E: Relies on definitions in Section 115C, which are clear and settled. Clause 214: Does not provide definitions, possibly relying on definitions elsewhere in the Bill or the Act. This could lead to interpretational issues. 6. Legislative Clarity and Drafting Section 115E: More detailed, with explicit references to rates, categories, and definitions. Clause 214: Simpler structure, but with less detail. This may improve readability but could result in ambiguities. 7. Policy Implications Section 115E: The gradual increase in LTCG rates reflects a policy shift towards higher revenue mobilization while retaining some concessions. Clause 214: The uniform 12.5% rate for LTCG on specified assets may simplify the regime but could be less attractive for those who would have benefited from the lower grandfathered rate. 8. Potential Conflicts and Harmonization The coexistence of these provisions, especially during the transition from the 1961 Act to the new Bill, may create confusion for taxpayers regarding which regime applies to which assessment year or transaction. Judicial or administrative clarification may be necessary to harmonize the application of these provisions, particularly in cases where the definitions or scope differ. Conclusion Clause 214 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 represents a continuation, with modifications, of the special tax regime for non-resident Indians investment income and long-term capital gains, as established section 115E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 . The core structure-concessional flat rates for specified categories of income-remains intact, reflecting the enduring policy objective of attracting NRI investments. However, Clause 214 introduces a uniform rate for LTCG on specified assets, omitting the grandfathering seen in Section 115E, and potentially broadens the scope to include foreign companies, though this requires clarification. The simplification of rates and the streamlined structure in Clause 214 may enhance compliance and administrative efficiency but could also introduce interpretational uncertainties, particularly regarding definitions and scope. The transition from Section 115E to Clause 214 must be managed carefully to avoid disputes and ensure clarity for taxpayers and administrators alike. Further legislative or judicial clarification may be needed to resolve ambiguities, especially concerning the applicability to foreign companies and the precise definitions of key terms. Overall, while the new clause retains the spirit of the earlier provision, its success in balancing revenue considerations with the objective of promoting foreign investment will depend on its implementation and the resolution of the identified ambiguities. Full Text : Clause 214 Tax on investment income and long-term capital gains.