Tax Management India. Com
                        Law and Practice: A Digital eBook ...
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Articles News
D. Forum
What's New


Discussions Forum
Home Forum Goods and Services Tax - GST This
A Public Forum.
Anyone can participate to share knowledge.
We acknowledge the contributions of Experts/ Authors.

Submit new Issue / Query

← Previous Next →

Can LUT be used for the Export / SEZ sales prior to it applied, Goods and Services Tax - GST

Issue Id: - 117225
Dated: 16-5-2021
By:- Krishna PANYAM
Can LUT be used for the Export / SEZ sales prior to it applied

  • Contents

LUT is applied on 13th Mar 2021 for FY 2020 - 2021. Would the company is eligible to use this LUT for the Export and SEZ Sales prior to the apply of LUT fot the FY 20-21 (Means would it be eligible for the period April 2020 to 12th Mar 2021)

Post Reply

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 5 of 5 Records

1 Dated: 16-5-2021
By:- Rajagopalan Ranganathan


According to rule 96A (1) of CGST Rules, 2017, any registered person availing the option to supply goods or services for export without payment of integrated tax shall furnish, a bond or a Letter of Undertaking prior to export. Therefore LUT executed will not cover exports made prior to execution of the LUT.

According to rule 96A (6) of the same rules the provisions of sub rule (1) shall apply, mutatis mutandis, in respect of zero-rated supply of goods or services or both to a Special Economic Zone developer or a Special Economic Zone unit without payment of integrated tax.

2 Dated: 17-5-2021

Sh.Krishna Panyam Ji,

I agree with the view of Sh.Ranganathan, Sir.

Delay is condonable in view of Board's circular mentioned in reply to earlier query. Export benefit be denied in case you have all other documentary evidence in support of actual export i.e. receipt of foreign exchange, invoice etc..

It depend on how you represent your case.

3 Dated: 17-5-2021
By:- Krishna PANYAM

Dear Kasturi Sir and Ranganathan sir,

Thank you for clarifying me on the above.

4 Dated: 27-5-2021

In continuation to the reply of Kasturi Sir, in our view following two judgments will be beneficial to the export in this matter:-

M/s. JD Engineering v. CCE-New Delhi. 2015 (6) TMI 1218 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI - LUT Procedure lapse.

Commissioner Central Excise Commissioner Vs M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.-2015 (5) TMI 100 - PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT (Punjab and Haryana High Court). Substantial benefit cannot be denied for mere procedural lapse: HC

5 Dated: 27-5-2021

M/s. YAGAY and SUN,

Sir, I want citation of both case laws. Will you please oblige me ? Thanks a lot.


Post Reply

← Previous Next →

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || Database || Members || Refer Us ||

© [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.
|| Site Map - Recent || Site Map || ||